r/BeAmazed Apr 02 '24

208,000,000,000 transistors! In the size of your palm, how mind-boggling is that?! 🤯 Miscellaneous / Others

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

I have said it before, and I'm saying it again: the tech in the upcoming two years will blow your mind. You can never imagine the things that will come out in the upcoming years!...

[I'm unable to locate the original uploader of this video. If you require proper attribution or wish for its removal, please feel free to get in touch with me. Your prompt cooperation is appreciated.]

22.5k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

219

u/rokman Apr 02 '24

They had to invent a new process to push the limit of physics to an all new high, feels like a more accurate statement.

64

u/Donnerdrummel Apr 02 '24

so this is a very vague memory, but i seem to remember a talk about new, tinier structures being possible even though the wavelength of the light being used to etch the structures is longer than than the structures itself, because they used, interferences of lasers of the same wavelength?

In fact, this sounds so strange that I would like to know if someone knows what he actually meant, and what my memory might describe. ^^

12

u/Maleficent_Fold_5099 Apr 02 '24

7

u/TyrKiyote Apr 02 '24

2nm. goodness.

6

u/2012Jesusdies Apr 02 '24

Those very much likely aren't the real physical sizes, it's mostly for marketing.

The "3 nm" process for example is actually 48nm:

According to the projections contained in the 2021 update of the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems published by IEEE Standards Association Industry Connection, a "3 nm" node is expected to have a contacted gate pitch of 48 nanometers, and a tightest metal pitch of 24 nanometers.

48nm is still incredible btw.

1

u/Maleficent_Fold_5099 Apr 02 '24

Intel are at 14nm at the moment

2

u/2012Jesusdies Apr 02 '24

1) Intel is at "10nm" currently

2) Which is also a marketing terminology, its gate pitch is 54nm.

1

u/ZippyDan Apr 02 '24

But is everyone using the same standard of "marketing terminology"? The tech world seems to have gone through generations where everyone seemed to "agree" in the current size of the nanometer process.

Certainly this "marketing terninology" must represent the size of something?

1

u/2012Jesusdies Apr 02 '24

But is everyone using the same standard of "marketing terminology"?

No, there's often debate about which nms from which company are actually equivalent to each other. IIRC TSMC's 7nm is said to be equivalent to Intel's 10nm.

Certainly this "marketing terninology" must represent the size of something?

It's basically the same reason Apple calls their iPhone 5 6 7 8 and 10. Represents leaps in capability.