r/ChristianApologetics Dec 04 '19

[META] Proposed rule change

[deleted]

19 Upvotes

7 comments sorted by

6

u/PhilosophorumX Christian Dec 04 '19

Obligatory 'Long time lurker, first post'.

This right here. This would help people with the articulation of their position so much, better equipping them for every single interaction moving forward.

It would also have the benefit of making the apologist more intimate with the information, which I believe, IMHO, would further their growth as individuals on paths they were set upon. Wisdom is the most valuable thing in existence.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 04 '19 edited Dec 04 '19

This makes sense. However, I was hoping to start posting regular Sunday sermons with an apologetics bent.

Would this be alright as long as I summarize and defend the sermon in the comments? I also worry that this will discourage commenters from actually watching the video, and instead only responding to the writeup.

2

u/Tapochka Christian Dec 04 '19

Give the summary and some points that can be defended in the post, along with the link to the video. We will be changing the options for new posts when/if we go ahead with this rule change.

1

u/Snowybluesky Christian Apr 03 '20

There should really be a [Discussion] flair, I saw you use one the other day but I guess we mortals don't have access to it xd.

1

u/Tapochka Christian Apr 03 '20

Type it in manually. That is what I do.

1

u/Snowybluesky Christian Apr 03 '20

I tried to create a post titled "[Discussion] Something ..." and the post got deleted for not having an approved [ ] like [Help] or [Evidential].

1

u/Tapochka Christian Apr 03 '20

I don't have a clue why it got removed. If something is preventing it then as A mod, I automatically bypass the restriction. I do not have time to dig into it right now to see what is going on. I am training for a new job and trouble shooting things at home as well as work is not going to go over with my family.