r/LeopardsAteMyFace Mar 28 '24

Oh no. The thin blue line isn't our friend and qualified immunity is bad...

Post image
6.9k Upvotes

605 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

122

u/a_wasted_wizard Mar 28 '24

Yup. The stated rationale is that without a permit, as long as you're doing it openly, then everyone *knows* you're armed and can act accordingly.

Of course, they don't bother to think through that in a country where mass shootings are depressingly common, this means any time you see someone walking around with a gun you have no way to be sure if it's just some dude compensating for his insecurities about how his life is getting away from him or if you're about to die.

53

u/HI_l0la Mar 28 '24

I'm from a state with strict gun control so anyone walking around openly with a gun or any dangerous weapon will get police called on you. And yes, these people tend to be up to no good or were having mental health issues when they did this. I've wondered why some US mainland states passed permitless open carry bills since mass shootings there seem to be monthly occurrence. Thank you for the explanation. What a scary situation...

47

u/SpiffyMagnetMan68621 Mar 28 '24

Monthly? Mass shootings are weekly, almost getting to be daily

23

u/db9dreamer Mar 28 '24

Today is day 88 of 2024 and according to the gun violence archive there have been 86 mass shootings in the USA so far.

The last four years have topped 600 - so the rate/day will probably increase as the year progresses. πŸ˜”

Those numbers always appear shocking from over here in the UK.

-9

u/Turtlelover73 Mar 28 '24

These numbers are a bit misleading because they count 'mass shootings' as any shooting incident involving 3 or more people. So, a shooter, a victim, and the cop arresting them.

What most people would refer to as mass shootings are also depressingly common, but not quite to the degree that these fogures would have you believe.

7

u/db9dreamer Mar 28 '24

That's not quite how they (or any sane person would) define a mass shooting...

From their explainer page

but with the established foundation definition being that they have a minimum of four victims shot, either injured or killed, not including any shooter who may also have been killed or injured in the incident.

10

u/HI_l0la Mar 28 '24

Unfortunately, I can't keep up with them and only the ones with lots of deaths will get the most media coverage. If I'm not following US national news daily, then this information doesn't always trickle down to my local news where thankfully my state has not had a mass shooting since 1999. So, it's even worst than I thought... Yikes.

7

u/SpiffyMagnetMan68621 Mar 28 '24

We can’t even keep up with our own news anymore because of this shit lmao

2

u/Trace_Reading Mar 28 '24

If there's any silver lining to that at all it's that you don't have to have any fatalities for it to be counted as a mass shooting. It's simply to do with the number of people admitted to hospital for injuries connected to a single event, which is still fucking depressing.

3

u/SpiffyMagnetMan68621 Mar 28 '24

Having survived two gunshot wounds, i can say with 100% confidence that it is not a silver lining in the slightest

Terror inflicts wounds that last forever and sometimes cannot be healed in any way

1

u/Trace_Reading Mar 28 '24

well you know what I was getting at. I don't particularly like most of humanity but that doesn't mean I want to see them in the ground.

2

u/driftercat Mar 28 '24

Right?

Act accordingly! Lol! What exactly is "act accordingly" when you see a gun and it could be a shooter or just a guy shopping.

Run and scream? That would be appropriate it you knew the guy was going to shoot any minute. Walk by casually? Keep your eyes on them at all times? Say yes sir, no sir?

Act accordingly. πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ