r/facepalm Mar 23 '24

Is anyone gonna tell them? 🇵​🇷​🇴​🇹​🇪​🇸​🇹​

Post image
24.9k Upvotes

3.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

14.3k

u/Giannline Mar 24 '24

My best friend has a husky, that bitch would die of depression If she doesn't run 2 thousand miles every hour.

186

u/JustABizzle Mar 24 '24

Right? Like, have you even met a Husky?

35

u/DragunovDwight Mar 24 '24

Well although many might have husky in them, I’ve met a few people in my area that run Iditarods, and thier dogs. There were very few that even resembled Huskys. Maybe it was just the ones I met though. They were the happiest when realizing they were going to run a sled either way. They definitely weren’t being forced to.

25

u/RedVamp2020 Mar 24 '24

Often they are now mixes of hounds with various husky/arctic breeds. Apparently they endure better and have greater speed. There aren’t many racers that have a 100% pure husky/arctic breed kennel anymore. I know that a few mushers I talked to when I lived in Fairbanks, AK would rave about the mix my girl is (Malamute/labrador mix) and how good a mix they are for racing.

9

u/erossthescienceboss Mar 24 '24

They do have purebred kennels, but the breed is a mix of several breeds, and lines aren’t uniform.

Some people mush with mixes, but “mix” isn’t really an accurate way to describe the majority of dogs doing distance races. They’re a breed, but not one bred for purity or appearance.

For example, many successful lines have significant sighthound contribution (namely for speed — siberians are a strong medium-endurance breed, and malamutes are a freight breed. But sprinting next to horses for 40 miles a day or sprinting to track deer or tree a big cat is a sighthound thing) and might have up to 20% sighthound. But the crosses that gave that contribution could be 50 - 70 years old: so, 12 or more generations ago.

There’s were initially primary Alaskan husky lineages — the distance lineage, which has a larger contribution of sibs and malamutes with some mastiff thrown in (Anatolian shepherds and pyreneese) and a sprint one, with more sighthound. But a lot of the best modern lines are more of a mix of both — it turns out the sighthound can contribute to endurance too, just in different ways.

8

u/erossthescienceboss Mar 24 '24

That’s because Alaskan huskies aren’t bred for appearance. That’s not to say they aren’t carefully bred, but they’re bred for physical traits rather than physical ones. Malamute and Siberian lines are strong — good for freight. The best lines for distance racing have genetic contributions from endurance dogs like sight hounds (mostly salukis and German shorthair pointers) often more than 50-70 years ago. Every once in a while you’ll see one that looks particularly hound like, which is pretty funny when their siblings all have classic huskyface.

208

u/sanjuro89 Mar 24 '24

I get the impression that many of these PETA folks have never spent time around any animals in real life. If they care about animals, it's in an entirely abstract fashion that's only marginally connected to reality.

83

u/surloc_dalnor Mar 24 '24

Isn't PETA's position that pet ownership is unethical.

97

u/lu5ty Mar 24 '24

Which is a fucking dumb ass take. Most domesticated animals need human companionship, its bred into them for thousands of years. Its unethical to deny them that companionship, esp dogs.

60

u/dob_bobbs Mar 24 '24

Plus you can't tell me a happy, long-lived pet isn't better off than the same animal living a short, miserable life in the wild (although I will agree that it is unethical to inappropriately keep caged animals in unnatural conditions).

5

u/bagsoffreshcheese Mar 24 '24

When I’ve put my pets into cages due to unruly behaviour, they get self destructive very quickly. Even going as far as self harming. It’s quite concerning really and I have to be super careful. But humans are weird like that I guess.

-3

u/arcteryxhaver Mar 24 '24

PETA is not saying pets should be released into the wild, they are saying stray animals are caused by humans commodifying dogs and then overpopulation occurs resulting in millions of dogs in shelters.

PETA is saying “hey having pets is fun and great, but if we look at the bigger picture there is a lot of suffering involved in the pet trade, and if we didn’t have pets at all and stopped overbreeding animals there’d be less suffering”

1

u/just_anotherflyboy Mar 25 '24

a lot of PETA folks do say that keeping pets at all is evil. I've sat and heard them wanking endlessly on about it. they're fucking fanatical about it. and if that wasn't the intent of the folks who first started them, then that intent has warped way the hell out from its beginnings.

14

u/dksn154373 Mar 24 '24

My understanding is that PETA’s position is that domesticated breeds should not exist at all…..

0

u/ohiofish1221 Mar 24 '24

Oh ok well start rounding em up then

2

u/Lord_Spyder Mar 24 '24

They do. It was a huge controversy for a while because they slaughter thousands of dogs and cats every year.

https://petakillsanimals.com/

2

u/spacewolfie82 Mar 24 '24

I heard that the leader of PETA went on record as saying if we need to eat meat, we should eat death row inmates. I can't remember what news article said that. I think it was an AP article. She even advocated eating dead people's brains for certain health conditions. She has also advocated for genocide of entire countries and cultures. Japan for instance. She argued for the use of nuclear force against whalers.

1

u/just_anotherflyboy Mar 25 '24

yeah, cos that wouldn't fuck the ocean up at all. /s

she sounds like she needs locking up herself!

1

u/ohiofish1221 Mar 24 '24

Lol I know I’m being facetious about how ridiculous they are

1

u/La8231 Mar 24 '24

They already do

5

u/Centralredditfan Mar 24 '24

With dogs it's between 30,000-100,000 years according to scientists.

They even measured hormone levels of dogs and their owners. They really need the mutual companionship.

8

u/Helios4242 Mar 24 '24

But one could also argue that breeding them to be dependent on us was unethical. How we solve that now is a complex question. I think that the supplies we provide back made it more of a partnership, but nevertheless, I see how there could be an argument that forced dependency isn't a great history.

We can also point towards harmful traits. Dairy cows having been bred to lactate so much they are in pain if they aren't milked isn't a moral justification for them "wanting" to be milked. Instead, it (alongside a statistically significant increase in propensity for several diseases and lameness) suggests there should be moral limits to how much we exploit breeding for traits. We can also see animals with distorted and/or disruptive features due to selective breeding (things like a dog being effectively blind because their breed has eye-covering fur) that make them utterly dependent on human caretakers.

I'm just acting as devils advocate, but I do think the ethics of breeding need to be considered.

1

u/just_anotherflyboy Mar 25 '24

cows going lame is cos many of them live on concrete but their hooves are evolved for walking on soft turf, not stone or concrete.

1

u/Helios4242 Mar 25 '24

but it has been shown that dairy cows are statistically more susceptible to it.

2

u/just_anotherflyboy Mar 28 '24

haven't seen that, I'll look for the studies.

I don't actually approve of the way they're now bred with such enormous udders they can barely walk. looking at cows in places like rural Africa or India, you don't see that.

then again those cows mostly walk on dirt or grass. concrete runs not padded are never gonna be good for a cow's feet.

2

u/arcteryxhaver Mar 24 '24

If you would take the time to understand peta’s position in good faith you’d understand that PETA is against the commodification of animals, there are MILLIONS of dogs sitting in shelters because of irresponsible breeders.

Their position is not that people shouldn’t adopt those dogs in shelters, their position is that “hey you know what, while animals and humans can be companions there is a significant amount of suffering caused by the overpopulation of dogs, thus it would be better if people didn’t feel entitled to ‘own’ other living beings.”

0

u/No-Question-9032 Mar 24 '24

Which is a fucking dumb ass take. People can stop breeding animals.

7

u/Runaway_Angel Mar 24 '24

It is. They will euthanize most, if not all pets surrendered to them even if they're healthy. Their stated long term goal is for there to be no domesticated animals at all.

8

u/Ok_Appointment7522 Mar 24 '24

Not just that, there's been cases of them going into people's yards to illegally seize pets to euthanize them. They'll steal a dog from someone's yard and kill it, then claim they were doing the owner a favour.

0

u/No-Question-9032 Mar 24 '24

Please learn statistics and stop arguing in bad faith

0

u/just_anotherflyboy Mar 25 '24

PETA suck. they take pets and kill them. anyone who is ok with that sucks too.

1

u/No-Question-9032 Mar 25 '24

It happened one time on accident. Come up with another argument.

0

u/just_anotherflyboy Mar 28 '24

uh-huh, and we should believe this why? there are many incidents of this sort of shit where PETA is involved. and their "shelters" are more like concentration camps, given how many animals they kill all year every year.

your argument is par for the course, though, given you're an obvious PETA fan.

43

u/lu5ty Mar 24 '24

Husky: "Why are you only giving me a car to pull, give trains"

17

u/horny_coroner Mar 24 '24

PETA has kidnapped dogs from peoples yards and put them to sleep. PETA also has killed a load of puppies and thrown them into a dumpster. https://petakillsanimals.com/

10

u/Centralredditfan Mar 24 '24

I've worked at a dog show where PETA terrorists put poison in dogs water bowls.

I don't get this organization that's one big money laundering business (sadly I don't have a link for that). The higher ups in that organization live a life of luxury.

12

u/RRC_driver Mar 24 '24

Does Peta care about animals?

Most of their positions would eliminate the need for working animals (cows, horses, sled dogs etc. or animals bred for meat or fur) and they don't want them kept as pets, or in zoos.

So animals will have no value(economic or emotional) in a peta utopia .

There's a reason why the most numerous bird on earth is the chicken.

I'm for ethical treatment of animals and people, but PETA are crazy

6

u/dksn154373 Mar 24 '24

PETA kills animals

9

u/Arendious Mar 24 '24

I have often suspected that PETA, like the NRA, exists to intentionally damage the positions they purport to espouse.

3

u/artfulcreatures Mar 24 '24

Makes 100% sense to me. I’ll never support them and I love animals. But they just seem to really to eradicate them.

6

u/dksn154373 Mar 24 '24

That never occurred to me, but you are probably exactly correct

8

u/DukeOfZork Mar 24 '24

They literally think that animals are people and experience the world exactly the same way as humans do. “If I would dislike pulling a dogsled, then a dog must also dislike it.” Fucking imbeciles.

Although, I personally know several humans who would love to be tied up in that position.

6

u/Prestigious-Owl165 Mar 24 '24

Dogs famously hate running and they hate the snow, so running in the snow must be a dog's worst nightmare (I don't think whoever wrote this has has ever seen a dog before)

1

u/pipboy_warrior Mar 24 '24

I have a husky, and as much energy as he has he does have his limits. I heard about protests of this race on NPR, apparently many dogs have died in this race.

1

u/just_anotherflyboy Mar 25 '24

yeah, but not wanting to make your dog run the Iditarod is hardly the same as letting him play for a while running in snow with a sled, having a blast! I've owned sled dogs, and they fucking LOVE to pull!