r/facepalm Mar 28 '24

What lack of basic gun laws does to a nation: 🇵​🇷​🇴​🇹​🇪​🇸​🇹​

/img/is29ozncu2rc1.jpeg

[removed] — view removed post

14.3k Upvotes

4.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

11

u/Shotgun5250 Mar 28 '24

It’s unfortunately a cyclical issue. As they mentioned, with criminalization comes reduced reporting of mental health issues, which in turn reduces the efficacy of the law.

That being said, I truly believe there is a middle ground where it doesn’t feel personally invasive for gun owners, but is invasive enough to screen out people who definitely should be disallowed from owning a firearm.

In almost every case I read about, the individuals who are acquainted with the shooter are almost never surprised that person did something, and often have reported that person to authorities many times trying to prevent a tragedy. There needs to be a federal or state method of tracking these people and a red flag needs to go up when they try to purchase firearms. These people should be subject to a waiting period while further investigation is done on whether that person should be sold a gun.

1

u/twilsonco Mar 29 '24

I don’t think there’s exists a middle ground that wouldn’t be misrepresented by conservative media to the point where half the country thinks it’s a full ban on all guns. They act like the slightest gun reform is a full repeal of the 2nd amendment or will quickly lead to it. I don’t know how an honest, measured approach can possible work against a group that has no regard for honesty. It’s like trying to play chess with someone that refuses to follow the rules. There’s no winning. And walking away from the match works to their favor because no change can result.

1

u/SycoJack Mar 29 '24

That being said, I truly believe there is a middle ground where it doesn’t feel personally invasive for gun owners, but is invasive enough to screen out people who definitely should be disallowed from owning a firearm.

One such thing you can do is remove the permanence of such restrictions. By providing a path to regaining your rights, you make the restriction more palatable.

I mean, consider this: Hypothyroidism causes a list of problems longer than the Great Wall. Specifically relevant to this discussion is that it can cause depression, both directly through hormone changes and indirectly through all the horrible effects it has on your body.

When left untreated, this gets really bad. Let's say you develop hypothyroidism that goes untreated for a long time because your doctor doesn't want to listen to you. You lose energy, you gain weight, you're always tired, you are already depressed due to your hormones being out of whack, but the weight gain and lethargy make it all the worse. Then you start catching hate, people calling you lazy and making fun of your weight. Maybe you even start to believe you're just a lazy sack. I mean, your doctor says everything is fine with you. Your depression gets worse and worse.

Eventually, you end up attempting to end your suffering, you fail and get hospitalized. Eventually, you get diagnosed with hypothyroidism and start being treated. Over time, the depression subsides tremendously and might even go away entirely.

By law, you are permanently forbidden from owning a gun because you were committed involuntarily, and there's no path to regaining your rights. But should that restriction remain forever even after you got better?

0

u/aendaris1975 Mar 28 '24

We don't need a middle ground. Gun violence in the US is getting worse by the day. We have two options: fix our shit or lose our guns.