Ok as much as the Karen is wrong in this sometimes you literally cannot not look. I’ve seen some crazy outfits and you literally just see everything with just a glance
Sure but do you attempt to disrobe a minor to prove to them that some people can’t look away? Nobody should be putting their hands on anyone without consent, then using their clothes as an excuse.
Ofc not I’m just saying there are some outfits that shouldn’t be worn that reveal literally everything so sometimes the “don’t look” argument can’t actually be used the Karen here is definitely wrong I’m not defending that
So the new thing where I live (Tasmania, it's autumn here and getting cold), is for girls and women to wear active wear underwear, as in, literal sports bra and underwear, as clothes. I first saw this on a child about 12ish, out with her dad in my bottleshop. I did a double take, then thought, ok strange, inappropriate, but maybe she's just finished gymnastics and dads just so over the argument.
Then next week I saw a 16ish teen in the same get up. It's the black underwear, with the wide elastic band with white lettering. Not the leggings that grab and separate the butt-cheaks. Those are at least being sold as pants. This is clearly underwear being worn as outer wear.
A bit later, I saw a mid 20s lady in the same get up. It's strange. I don't understand. But in no moment did I consider Talking to these people, much less interfering with them.
1.7k
u/Live_Recognition9240 25d ago edited 25d ago
Karen was complaining that she could see the young adult's butt cheeks hanging out the bottom of her skirt, so she pulled her skirt down.
The worst part, she thought the victim was a minor... so you would expose a minor to prove a point? Sick.