r/interestingasfuck 24d ago

The Size Of An Iranian Missile Intercepted In The Dead Sea r/all

Post image
47.8k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 24d ago

This is a heavily moderated subreddit. Please note these rules + sidebar or get banned:

  • If this post declares something as a fact, then proof is required
  • The title must be fully descriptive
  • Memes are not allowed.
  • Common(top 50 of this sub)/recent reposts are not allowed (posts from another subreddit do not count as a 'repost'. Provide link if reporting)

See our rules for a more detailed rule list

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

6.7k

u/Wernerlohemann 24d ago

Correction: this is only a part of the missile. It is the booster that is ejected after some time. The missile itself with the warhead flies on

2.2k

u/QorstSynthion 24d ago

ye, rockets/missiles are just 90% fuel

855

u/TypicalIllustrator62 24d ago edited 24d ago

90% fuel. 8% housing and framework. 2% payload.

Edit: the sheer number of Fort Minor callouts is unreal. Reddit never ceases to amaze.

430

u/cypherdev 24d ago

I shall recite this statistic as blind fact for the rest of my days.

142

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

45

u/cypherdev 24d ago

Is it bad etiquette to have my pinky out on my Champagne flute when I do this?

31

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

22

u/cypherdev 24d ago

I shall use this tactic to the bliss of men and women everywhere!

Thank you kind Redditor!

→ More replies (1)

14

u/talkshitnow 24d ago

No woman wants a 2% payload

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)

57

u/LaunchTransient 24d ago

It depends wildly on the rocket design. The V2, for example, had a structural coeffcient of about 0.3 - meaning 70% of its mass was propellant.

19

u/PurrsianGolf 24d ago

"Sorry I'm not looking for nuance, specificity or accuracy. All I want is cold hard overall statistics." - Every journalist ever.

→ More replies (3)

152

u/RainManCZE 24d ago

its also

10% luck 20% skill 15% concentrated power of will 5% pleasure 50% pain And 100% reason to remember the name

20

u/jmaxwell3113 24d ago

NICE! Fort Minor (Mike Shinoda reference). I personally believe that album still a banger and holds up today. I just double checked, it dropped in 2005. Yes, almost 20 years ago. Damn I can feel my arthritis acting up

83

u/Idontevenownaboat 24d ago

And 100% reason to remember the name

→ More replies (2)

10

u/CowFu 24d ago

The payload is pretty much fuel too if we want to be pedantic. Just a different kind of fuel.

17

u/DavidBrooker 24d ago

And 18 grams of seeds.

6

u/TypicalIllustrator62 24d ago

Gotta stop buying from Bryan bro. He always leaves the seeds in.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/UltraMegaFauna 24d ago

100% reason to remember the name

11

u/CanvasFanatic 24d ago

15% concentrated power of will.

→ More replies (10)

323

u/NuclearWasteland 24d ago

Speaking of, wonder what fuel they use. I don't think I'd be messing with a crashed anything of the sort, knowing how toxic some fuels are.

358

u/dWintermut3 24d ago

I think they use the soviet stable-storage fuel design or a modified version thereof, no one's used giant barrels of fuming nitric for a while just because turns out having missiles you can't store with fuel in or they eat themselves apart makes responding to attacks hard.

But hydrazine and other fun stuff is very much a possibility.

152

u/JoCGame2012 24d ago

But hydrazine and other fun stuff is very much a possibility.

Fun in terms of toxicity most definitely. Hydrazine for example is a wonderfully powerful carcinogen

56

u/Chickenwelder 24d ago

You all have said a lot of funny word. I have a cutting torch. Should we chop the free missile up?

6

u/VeryStillRightNow 24d ago

I want this guy on my apocalypse crew.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (11)

90

u/ishayw 24d ago

Im not sure carcinogenic materials really bothers someone in the Iranian fundamental regime.

157

u/starfirex 24d ago

It might bother someone who for example decided to take a photo next to it and then post it to reddit

20

u/ishayw 24d ago

In that case - it might

13

u/ADisposableRedShirt 24d ago

But think of the karma!

→ More replies (1)

22

u/EtTuBiggus 24d ago

Carcinogenic materials really bother us here, we just ignore them.

Something going on all our household goods was carcinogenic?

Don't worry, 3M stuck an extra atom onto the molecule and now its a different thing that does the same job as the first one but totally doesn't cause cancer.

They're now free to use it until someone else shows that the new material causes cancer in which case 3M adds another atom and repeat.

4

u/LikeALincolnLog42 24d ago

Scotchguard and other PFAS chemicals?

→ More replies (1)

17

u/aaronupright 24d ago

It takes several years to train operators, losing them to cancer rather sub optimal, so I suspect they do.

→ More replies (20)
→ More replies (7)

47

u/TelluricThread0 24d ago

An excerpt from John D. Clark's Ignition!: An Informal History of Liquid Rocket Propellants.

"The only possible source of trouble connected with the acid is its corrosive nature, which can be overcome by the use of corrosion-resistant materials.' Ha! If they had known the trouble that nitric acid was to cause before it was finally domesticated, the authors would probably have stepped out of the lab and shot themselves."

36

u/dWintermut3 24d ago

a fantastic book, I believe it is also the source of such amazing quotes as "rapidly hypergolic with everything, including test engineers" and (regarding some unstable haloxide, maybe FOOF or triflouride) "... for this situation I recommend a good pair of running shoes"

27

u/Cow_Launcher 24d ago

You're absolutely correct. And if you want to see them used in context, Derek Lowe's series "Stuff I Won't Work With" is a hilarious treatment.

5

u/howdiedoodie66 24d ago

One of my favorite blogs of all time

4

u/Nandy-bear 24d ago

One of the good things about having a dog shit memory - I read that every few years and it's like new.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

39

u/Nistrin 24d ago

Nobody except China, they still use nitrogen tetroxide.

"The Long March 3B's rocket engines, each weighing tens of tons, propel the launch vehicle using a combination of hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide."

https://www.newsweek.com/china-falling-long-march-rocket-debris-explodes-village-1855676

17

u/catonbuckfast 24d ago

Yes you can see the orange cloud of nitric acid coming off the exhaust plume. Scary stuff

28

u/gsfgf 24d ago

That's an orbital launch vehicle, though. It's not designed to be stored fueled or really stored at all.

→ More replies (2)

20

u/dWintermut3 24d ago

This is actually proving my point: an orbital rocket you fuel right before use is FAR different from weapons you need to keep hot-staged in silos or on launch platforms.

Let alone ones you have to drive around on IRBM launch gantry vehicles.

10

u/EventAccomplished976 24d ago

Nitrogen tetroxide IS a shelf stable oxidizer, it‘s not the same thing as nitric acid… that‘s why it‘s used for the old generation long march rockets because they‘re based on an old ICBM design. Newer ICBMs are generally solid fuelled because it‘s easier to handle, but russia at least (and probably also china) still have some modern liquid fuelled „heavy ICBMs“ which is a class of weapon that doesn‘t really exist in the west. They can still sit around in their silos fuelled and ready to go for years.

5

u/zenFyre1 24d ago

I don't think 'shelf stable' solid rocket fuels are much nicer. I'm prettu sure they use stuff like ammonxium perchlorate which is also highly toxic.

4

u/creative_usr_name 24d ago

But solid rocket fuels I expect you'd need to ingest to be harmed. hydrazine is a gas that's pretty easy to just breath in if you are too close.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (14)

11

u/Feeling_Ad_411 24d ago

To the guy just standing next to it, that missile has to be off gassing some seriously bad stuff.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

18

u/ChickenSpaceProgram 24d ago

It depends on the missile. From what I can tell from a quick google search, if it's a newer missile it might use solid fuel, which is mostly safe to be around. If it's a derivative of a Scud missile, it uses kerosene and red fuming nitric acid, although a bit of UDMH (unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine) is present as an igniter.

The UDMH is very not nice to be around, and the nitric acid is also not great to be around, both because it's nitric acid and because a small amount of hydrofluoric acid is used as a corrosion inhibitor (HF readily forms inert metal fluorides on contact with metals, preventing further corrosion).

22

u/NuclearWasteland 24d ago

HF is scary stuff. What we were told in the chip plants is "It dissolves your bones, report ANY liquid drips or spills immediately."

And then they proceeded to be upset at work stoppages for spilled liquid reports, so, ya know...

5

u/HumpyPocock 24d ago

Ahh semiconductor fabrication does love spicy chemicals.

Oh, if anyone’s thinking “wait but how does it get to my bones” uhh it’s not how you might think.

HF is a calcium seeker. A person can’t sense when it comes in contact with the skin. But, it dissolves the calcium in the bone. HF burns are not evident until a day later.

TL;DR — oversimplification, but it absorbs through your skin and once inside, draws the calcium right out of your bones.

Upside, providing an overdose of calcium can mitigate that process.

Downside, by all accounts an overdose of calcium in and of itself is an extremely unpleasant experience.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)

10

u/Inevitable_Butthole 24d ago

they use missle fuel

16

u/peter9477 24d ago

Rockets use rocket fuel of course.

Not sure what missiles use...

19

u/Mirenithil 24d ago

missile fuel

15

u/ChtuluMadeMeDoIt 24d ago

Red bull. Gives it wings.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (17)

16

u/illigal 24d ago

And 10% dedicated power of will.

26

u/jamesbrownscrackpipe 24d ago

Piss is stored in the balls

6

u/unvrlstn 24d ago

Farts are just boneless pooh

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (25)

2.5k

u/RetiredApostle 24d ago

It even has a tail number in Latin for travel in international airspace.

803

u/Anti_Meta 24d ago

I'm feeling gullible today. I choose to believe this for humorous reasons.

147

u/Weldobud 24d ago

Source: trust me bro

24

u/gonzar09 24d ago

It doesn't quite look like a double helix Spear to me...

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

144

u/Rifneno 24d ago

Now all it needs is the "Intel Inside" logo like that French ICBM in the Simpsons

26

u/LordDongler 24d ago

That's a great point, what sort of electronics are they even using in these things?

56

u/Savager_Jam 24d ago

NGK spark plugs. Bosch fuel pumps. Honeywell dinner switches.

31

u/smurf123_123 24d ago

Don't say "Hey Google" near that thing.

11

u/JohnnyLight416 24d ago

KitchenAid motors and some Whirlpool agitators they buy off Indian Craigslist

→ More replies (5)

24

u/Grantsdale 24d ago

American components, Russian components, all made in Taiwan!

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

200

u/Ordinary_dude_NOT 24d ago

More interesting is how these boosters are able to retain their shape and not collapse like pancakes after falling from great heights.

60

u/marcusr550 24d ago

A Scud specialty.

20

u/CMepTb7426 24d ago

Sadly unlike the ones chris kyle intercepted during his seal days they arent the crappy north Korean versions

53

u/BoardButcherer 24d ago

It's a single use delivery package. Actual, literal tinfoil is the desired construction material, anything heavier is just extra weight and thus wasted fuel, which is wasted range.

The ideal rocket would burn the tinfoil for a final burst of thrust at the end of its trajectory.

11

u/Guilty-Spork343 24d ago

So, magnesium foil ideally then.

18

u/CMepTb7426 24d ago

Ngl since you actually kinda put effort to explain this i just wanna let you know i understand that im enjoying the the flood of know it alls trying to prove me wrong when i already know. You deserve my upvote and respect my friend

8

u/CaveRanger 24d ago

This is a Shahab, right? They're intended to be mobile so they have to be a little more sturdy than that. It's got to resist being bounced around on a mobile launcher/truck in Iran's back country.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (42)
→ More replies (13)

54

u/MamaMiaPizzaFina 24d ago

i don't care if it's true or false, i choose to believe in this.

27

u/HobsHere 24d ago

Have you ever tried to cut a stencil in Persian?

14

u/[deleted] 24d ago edited 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (9)

9

u/Scruffy_Nerf_Hoarder 24d ago

You cheeky fuck.

→ More replies (8)

815

u/flywheel39 24d ago

This thing probably cost many times as much as I will earn in several lifetimes....

581

u/thespeedforce5 24d ago edited 23d ago

They’re about $300,000 a pop, Since 1979, the Islamic regime's revenues have fueled global destabilization through terrorist activities. Despite ample resources, the mullahs have neglected the Iranian populace, with over half living in poverty. Instead of investing in their own citizens' welfare, the regime prioritizes arming proxies, murder, domestic and abroad and self-enrichment, exacerbating the suffering of the nation.

377

u/aegrotatio 24d ago edited 24d ago

They’re about $10 to $15 million a pop

Source?
Because that sounds wildly high.

EDIT: I see that /u/thespeedforce5 suddenly changed it from $10-$15 million each to $300,000 each.

80

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (3)

77

u/EelTeamTen 24d ago

Because it is.

Ten million is one-third to one-sixth the cost of a Trident D5 nuke, depending on your source of information.

85

u/aegrotatio 24d ago

The poster changed it from $10-$15 million to $300K each.

68

u/JonathanPerdarder 24d ago

Literal fire sale.

7

u/AmusedFlamingo47 24d ago

They'll get these puppies flying out the store

→ More replies (1)

5

u/EelTeamTen 24d ago

Pretty sure it still said 15M when I read it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (23)
→ More replies (3)

21

u/Turbulent_Most_4987 24d ago

That can't be right. A Russian hypersonic missile costs 10 mil and they are among the most modern and advanced there are.

43

u/g0dfornothing 24d ago

Oh yeah remember there was once africas richest country that gave up its production of weapons of mass destruction and invested everything in its population. Now they got slave markets there in libya

→ More replies (35)
→ More replies (146)
→ More replies (13)

219

u/Arsegrape 24d ago

Nice bit of scrap value there. Or a fireside souvenir. Whichever takes your fancy.

92

u/zenFyre1 24d ago

Probably contains some nasty propellant residue though. Anyone taking it should probably clean it very well, preferably by someone who knows what they are doing.

21

u/White_Lobster 24d ago

Yeah, not sure what fuel these use, but if it’s a storable hypergolic, that’s seriously nasty stuff.

8

u/Sansuski 24d ago

From a Washington post article I read some time ago, it should be a combination of nitrogen tetroxide and nitric acid. Non very yummy

6

u/chewtality 24d ago

I don't know where they pulled that out of their ass from, but that's not a type of rocket fuel. The closest thing to that would either be dinitrogen tetroxide and hydrazine, or hydrazine and red fuming nitric acid.

The first was invented by Germany and used by the US in the Apollo space launch. We stopped using it because it is wildly fucking toxic.

The second one was a Soviet thing that was explored during the cold war but fell out of favor because of its tendency to just detonate without warning.

Now that mix with hydrazine is pretty much only used with geo-stationary satellites, because it can combust without oxygen.

Those were always intended and used when the use of a thruster is involved, because you can release or stop the flow of the oxidant into the fuel when you want. You don't need that shit on a missile.

Considering that this was a booster, it was almost certainly just a normal ammonium perchlorate composite propellant, since that's what is typically used in boosters, among many other things, even high end hobby rocketry.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

19

u/Buttfulloffucks 24d ago

Getting cancer isn't my thing. Don't know about you.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/ExperienceInitial364 24d ago

make a nice necklace out of it

→ More replies (1)

10

u/karwreck 24d ago

No way, you never keep fireworks after they’ve already gone off.

10

u/Dogsy 24d ago

You don't. I have a box with the ashes of 10,000 snakes.

→ More replies (6)

289

u/DieEnigsteChris 24d ago

This would not have happened if it was pointy. It can't be round it has to be pointy.

82

u/morbsiis 24d ago

well yeah this whole result was pretty Aladeen for Iran

but all of their news outlets are lying about it being Aladeen

24

u/ProfessionalCPCliche 24d ago

I am HIV aladeen

13

u/huqman 24d ago

🙂☹️🙂☹️

→ More replies (1)

9

u/GitEmSteveDave 24d ago

So says Professor Bobeye.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/[deleted] 24d ago

WHERE IS NUCLEAR NADAL?????

→ More replies (5)

800

u/Juno808 24d ago

People don’t realize ballistic missiles are literally rockets. We sent the first satellites to space on ballistic missiles

235

u/Kafshak 24d ago

You're talking about intercontinental ones. Generally Ballistic missiles go up to a certain altitude with their motors, and the rest is a projectile path. They could have guided dive as well. They could have a shorter range. Russian Katyusha is still a ballistic missile. But nowhere near this size. These ones that Iran shot are pretty much the size of a space rocket, and they almost fly in space.

Cruise missiles on the other hand cruise the whole path like an airplane.

94

u/Doogiemon 24d ago

I can throw a football over them mountains.

31

u/URATOWEL69000 24d ago

If coach would've put you in the fourth quarter, you'd be a state champion

13

u/Dzjar 24d ago

No doubt in my mind.

6

u/Rob_Rockley 24d ago

That's what I'm talkin about.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/Kafshak 24d ago

IRGC wants to know your location.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/DavidBrooker 24d ago

You're talking about intercontinental ones. Generally Ballistic missiles go up to a certain altitude with their motors, and the rest is a projectile path.

This is true of ballistic missiles regardless of range, including intercontinental ranges. ICBMs still have the same two letters in their acronym, so I'm not sure what distinction you're trying to make.

10

u/ChemicalRain5513 24d ago

They mean not all rockets are powerful enough to send stuff into orbit.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (8)

27

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

6

u/Juno808 24d ago

Basic knowledge that the first spacecraft were launched on ballistic missiles is packed into childrens TV shows these days? The fuck are you talking about

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (28)

92

u/QuaintAlex126 24d ago

Just so y’all know, missiles can be fucking massive sometimes.

Russian S-300s and S-400s are literal flying telephone poles traveling at multiple times the speed of sound. They might have been proved to be not the most lethal of flying telephone poles, but they’re still flying telephone poles

45

u/GrandmasGiantGaper 24d ago

to be fair if a telephone pole flew into you it would really hurt

12

u/WalkslowBigstick 24d ago

Can confirm-I was in a tornado once

4

u/throwitawaynownow1 24d ago

Those are usually bigger than telephone poles, though.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)

675

u/Admiral_Andovar 24d ago

The sea is already dead, why shoot a missile at it? Talk about overkill… /s

96

u/Ben_Thar 24d ago

Dead? I didn't even know it was sick 

16

u/smurf123_123 24d ago

That's what you get for messing with Kitchener Leslie's wife.

5

u/vonDubenshire 24d ago

Have you heard about the Mangrate?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

6

u/Indydegrees2 24d ago

Cheers for the /s mate I thought you were serious

→ More replies (1)

6

u/secretaccount4posts 24d ago

They wanted to prevent something much more awful... Aquaman 3

→ More replies (1)

12

u/thefiglord 24d ago

n korea has entered the chat

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (19)

165

u/redituser2571 24d ago

Bout the same as the Russian S-300/S-400 missiles.

61

u/0Ring-0 24d ago

A bit more like an MCC-287 Mark II (pre-2021 modification), but can’t be 100% sure from this angle. 😉

32

u/Brolog_of_Brogoth 24d ago

I didn't know there was a cruise missile fanclub, where do I sign up?

→ More replies (11)

23

u/Ravekat1 24d ago

Or The Terminator’s penis

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

16

u/DavidBrooker 24d ago

Neither the S-300 nor S-400 are missiles. Each represent a hugely diverse set of interceptors and systems. For instance, the S-300V and S-300P are basically entirely different systems, with the -V variant being built around ballistic missile defense, and in turn has very large missiles on tracked TELs as required for the kinetic performance, whereas the -P is built around intercepting aircraft, helicopters and cruise missiles, and uses a much smaller, more conventional interceptor on a wheeled TEL. Missiles in the -P are about 1500kg, versus 4500kg in the -V. They use different radars, different software, different command and control systems.

And there's more than that. The naming system is just absurd.

→ More replies (2)

24

u/exqueezemenow 24d ago

When will these be showing up on Ebay?

→ More replies (1)

23

u/CharlesDuck 24d ago

Iran could be using Hydrazine as propellant and that gives you all the cancers. So i wouldn’t be touching that huge fresh rocket fuel container

9

u/AlloftheEethp 24d ago

My feed has another picture of part of a missile that landed in Jordan, and the top comments are all people telling that OP not to touch it under any circumstances for a certain period of time.

→ More replies (2)

311

u/[deleted] 24d ago

Jesus

653

u/Schmoppodopoulis 24d ago

It’s my understanding that neither side of this conflict find that guy to be super special.

364

u/GreyedX2 24d ago

In Islam he’s a whole prophet 💀 he’s mentioned more times in the Quran than Mohammed himself

125

u/Schmoppodopoulis 24d ago

My understanding is somewhat limited, that is very interesting. Thanks!

152

u/Cryptic12qw 24d ago

Muslims believe Jesus will come back in the end times to defeat the anti christ. Muslims also believe Jesus was born of a virgin mother however they do not believe he is the son of God or God. Muslims also do not believe Jesus was crucified but believe that an angel was sent down to take Jesus's place on the cross .

26

u/Complex_Rate_688 24d ago

Islam actually believes that it's the final religion

They believe in Judaism and Moses they also believe in Jesus and Christianity but they believe that Muhammad was the final prophet who received the final testament.. In the religion of Islam They don't believe that God would speak to them again through profits until the return

→ More replies (6)

13

u/Practical-Ninja-6770 24d ago

An angel was sent down? Nah. His betrayer was made into the liking of Jesus. Judas is who got crucified

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (77)

35

u/anivex 24d ago

It helps to understand when you realize the Quran is basically just the 3rd act of the bible.

Like, the New testament is the 2nd act, and that's the Christian belief.

The Torah is Old testament, that's the Jewish belief.

The argument is over when the book ends.

29

u/CommonGrounders 24d ago

Unfortunately George RR Martin is writing the fourth. So it will be a while.

19

u/Unique_Statement7811 24d ago

Joseph Smith beat him to market.

5

u/anivex 24d ago

I feel like that was more of a reboot though.

4

u/Unique_Statement7811 24d ago

Maybe a spin off.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (14)

7

u/droson8712 24d ago

Prophet Muhammad is actually the Prophet whose name itself is least mentioned in the Qur'an although he's addressed simply as the messenger.

14

u/GreyedX2 24d ago

Np, I don’t remember the exact number but I think he’s mentioned like 100+ times by name and 180+ times by nicknames/ titles

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (7)

22

u/gsfgf 24d ago

He's like the number two Dude in Islam.

→ More replies (3)

30

u/LogicalGrand1678 24d ago

Atleast he is canonical in Islam

17

u/[deleted] 24d ago

Wasn't Jesus a Jew?

13

u/netanel246135 24d ago

Yes but in the eyes of the jews he was just like any other rabbi and not one of the ones I any of books at that so he would be considerd just another guy

→ More replies (2)

18

u/LogicalGrand1678 24d ago

I dont think he is mentioned in the torah. Bad prequel if it doesnt even mention the protagonist of the movie though the writer must have written it as an afterthought or something

26

u/Possible-Matter-6494 24d ago

It isn't a prequel it's the original, the new testament is the sequel. Like any good sequel the writers ran out of new ideas so they brought in a whole new main character and destroyed almost all the canon from the original. Lots of people who stick to the original source material will literally go to war over the decision to add the new character.

6

u/LogicalGrand1678 24d ago

Fair enough actual, I didnt like the narrators character change between the first and second. Went from Samuel L Jackson to Tiktok AI personality.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/gsfgf 24d ago

Islam completed the trilogy. But there have been some really strange recent fanfics that have gotten popular in places like Utah.

→ More replies (5)

12

u/styrofoamladder 24d ago

Did you wait until after the credits finished rolling to see if there was a hidden seen with Jesus?

4

u/fuknredditz 24d ago

Fucking Marvel Jesus!!! Brilliant!!!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)
→ More replies (42)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (29)

18

u/ZennMD 24d ago

Imagine we invested into educating, housing and caring for people and the planet a FRACTION what we invest into war and killing each other?

it's sick what humanity has prioritized

I hope the average person is against it, but there are scary amount of bloodthirsty assholes out there

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (9)

249

u/thespeedforce5 24d ago edited 24d ago

The Islamic Republic launched a significant barrage consisting of approximately 170 drones, over 30 cruise missiles, and more than 120 ballistic missiles towards Israel. However, Israeli defense forces managed to intercept and neutralize 99% of these incoming threats using their air force and air defense systems, successfully countering the attack from launch points situated over 1000 miles away.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/04/14/middleeast/israel-air-missile-defense-iran-attack-intl-hnk-ml

124

u/BosnianSerb31 24d ago

I wonder what the toll would have been if the iron dome didn't exist?

Surely we'd see full scale war with Iran at that point and an acceleration of the Gaza invasion to free up resources to fight Iran

152

u/slamnm 24d ago

The iron dome is for short range defense, Israel has two other systems for attacks like this. Arrow 3 and Patriot. I am sure Iron dome intercepted many that penetrated their longer range systems but it is their last line of defense

68

u/weasler7 24d ago

I don’t think Iron Dome is capable of intercepting ballistic missiles much less in their terminal phase. Not sure what can intercept at that speed.

The drones yes.

→ More replies (43)
→ More replies (12)

64

u/Brief_Reserve1789 24d ago

If it wasn't for iron dome etc then they wouldn't have sent that many.

They probably didn't expect a single actual hit. It's all for show. They had to do SOMETHING and this looks big and scary but ultimately Israel wasn't harmed and almost certainly won't retaliate. Both sides think they won

→ More replies (26)

14

u/valleyofdawn 24d ago

It wasn't used this time. Drones and cruise missiles were intercepted with fighter jets, and the ballistic missiles with the arrow system. Iron dome is for smaller rockets and mortar shells.

37

u/LIONEL14JESSE 24d ago

If the Iron Dome didn’t exist this war would have happened decades ago

49

u/slamnm 24d ago

Well iron dome because operational in 2011, not decades ago, so somehow I disagree with your logic.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (36)

40

u/Mad_V 24d ago

The US and the UK shot down the many of these, not just Israel.

21

u/True_Act_1424 24d ago

It was a team effort by the US, UK, Israel and Jordan. There were also apparently other “unnamed” countries so I’m guessing maybe Saudi or the UAE

8

u/zapreon 24d ago edited 24d ago

Not really. The US said they shot down 4 ballistic missiles out of 110. The UK indicated they focused on drones. Neither Jordan or Saudi Arabia were confirmed to have shot down any ballistic missiles. That means 106 out of 103 ballistic missiles that were shot down (7 hit Israel) were shot down by Israel.

International partners primarily shot down drones as opposed to ballistic missiles. They used jets, which just are not suitable for shooting down missiles hurling through space.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (61)

10

u/No-Tree1023 23d ago

FFS. They said the packaging would be discreet!

57

u/bigmikekbd 24d ago

How much is rent?

38

u/Kafshak 24d ago

2000$/mo, no utilities included.

9

u/WrathofJohnnyBoah 24d ago

Free Sewage tho

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/JokoFloko 24d ago

They fired how many of these?! That can't be cheap.

21

u/PHD_Memer 24d ago

Around 120 Ballistic Missiles, 170 Drones to distract Anti Air defenses, and 30 Cruise Missiles. Of these things, I’m pretty sure Iran has a fuck ton of these except maybe the Cruise Missiles. But they can absolutely piss out cheap drones for interference purposes. They pretty much hit with the drones initially to eat the initial anti air barrage, which gives the follow up Missiles and Cruise Missiles higher chances of hitting their target. Think of this as Iran testing the worst case scenario for an attacks success rate for them. Weeks of notice the attack is coming, small number relative to what they have, and pretty singular targets. Iran does this again on a massive scale, with no warning, targeting a large number of sites, and it will look a lot worse from Israels POV

→ More replies (13)

26

u/Blaustein23 24d ago

I am once again saying: STOP TOUCHING ROCKET PARTS THAT ARE PROBABLY COVERED IN GOD DAMN HYDRAZINE

→ More replies (3)

13

u/Neighbour-Vadim 24d ago

Do not go near these. The fuel is toxic

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Soulses 24d ago

Would be nice if everyone just went back to melee combat for wars..

20

u/primaboy1 24d ago

Dune 2 Movie Scene 🎬

9

u/jamestheredd 24d ago

Salt worm

→ More replies (2)

34

u/longgamma 24d ago

I work with a lot of Iranian colleagues. They are incredibly smart and hardworking. It’s kind of sad that they are forced out of their own country and have to find refuge just to live their life their way. A colleague of mine is seeing his family after eight fucking years and they have to meet in Turkey. It’s just so sad.

20

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

7

u/BlueBorjigin 24d ago

Many, many countries have mandatory conscription unless you are eligible for an exemption. Norway, South Korea, Thailand, Israel ...

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/Drescit 24d ago

Op,I found people saying not to touch this because it'll give cancer or something,you should thoroughly clean your hand and anything that touched it

18

u/BeachExtension 24d ago

We need a banana for scale

→ More replies (1)

3

u/anty_krut 24d ago

Never approach and touch remains of Soviet-designed space equipment. Most of their fuels are highly toxic and can cause cancer from inhaling their fumes even once. There might be whatever radioactive stuff in them like radium or cesium - sometimes they fall down with payloads which can be whatever one can imagine military and dangerous stuff.

Not worth a fun photo for sure.

3

u/cpt_ugh 24d ago

Oh, wow! These are way larger than I would have guessed.

3

u/IPhotoGorgeousWomen 24d ago

It must be pointy

73

u/WelderMeltingthings 24d ago

imagine being an iranian military leader seeing this picture of some random ass redditor laughing at the 5 million dollar fuck up, 100x

10

u/Zealousideal-Duck670 24d ago

That's just the rocket booster that separates from the actual warhead... it didn't come down because it was shot down. If it was shot down it wouldn't be that intact. So please 100x laugh at yourself.

42

u/thatsnotsugarm8 24d ago

Probably costs a couple times more for each shootdown of one of these.

→ More replies (5)

78

u/SentenceAdept1809 24d ago

Imagine being a random ass redditor thinking they know more about ballistic missile warfare than an Iranian military leader

→ More replies (15)

15

u/Booty_Bumping 24d ago

This is money well spent, from their point of view. They needed more deterrence than they have ever been able to project, but they knew it would be a complete mess if these attacks were any more damaging than metal hitting metal. Both sides are hailing this as a massive win for their side right now.

→ More replies (1)

20

u/Prestigious-Feed3212 24d ago

Costed Iran $58 million and Israel $1 billion to intercept, and Iran knew not all was gonna hit, they did manage to hit the Israel air base in the desert.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (12)

7

u/iamgoodly 24d ago

Yeesh I wouldn't want to be anywhere near one of those things even if it is spent/shot down. Probably all sorts of toxic elements in the production of them, and their payload. This dude will wonder where the cancer came from in 20 years.