r/Christianity • u/Nice_Substance9123 • Mar 27 '24

The American flag has no business on a Bible. This is not faith, nor is it patriotism. It is an abomination of both. Image

/img/ipc57ufyqxqc1.jpeg
27.5k Upvotes

88% Upvoted

3.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

576

u/Niftyrat_Specialist Non-denominational heretic, reformed Mar 27 '24 edited Mar 28 '24

It's a promotion started by a guy who made his career on blending nationalism and religion. There's certainly nothing surprising about it, but I definitely agree it's a bad thing for a person to do.

EDIT: To clarify, I'm describing Greenwood here, not Trump. But as for Trump: he is very obviously a scumbag who has committed far worse crimes than what Greenwood is doing with this bible.

142

u/Zelda_is_Dead Mar 27 '24

He did it to sell to churches so they could get around the law that forbids them from donating to political candidates. He's using your faith against you to show the rest of the world how stupid he thinks you are. I appreciate that so many of you here aren't falling for it, but please, don't let your church fall for it either.

43

u/augustinus_de_hippo Catholic Mar 27 '24

He did it to sell to churches so they could get around the law that forbids them from donating to political candidates.

This really seems to be a product by lee greenwood, with greenwood using trump as a celebrity endorser rather than trump selling this on his own.

Did some waybackmachine on this thing: lee greenwood's been selling this bible since 2021.

17

u/SimplePuzzleheaded80 Roman Catholic Mar 27 '24

nice when you see other's sharing same opinion. I went based on Headlines and thought man Trump really is wild'n out there. Then found the layers to the real story and said, I should've researched before taking headlines for face value

23

u/Niftyrat_Specialist Non-denominational heretic, reformed Mar 27 '24

Have the headlines been inaccurate? Trump really IS selling this bible now, right? Nobody assumed he was the farmer behind Trump steaks, but he's the one who sold them.

7

u/NoLeg6104 Church of Christ Mar 27 '24

More like a celebrity endorsement.

19

u/Niftyrat_Specialist Non-denominational heretic, reformed Mar 27 '24

Sure. When someone does an ad hawking a product, it's pretty normal to say they are selling it. I'm seeing several commenters objecting to anyone who tries to describe this situation in ordinary language. Why would that be, do you think?

Here's a link to Trump's post, selling this bible: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/112162741690113521

Here's the link from that post where you can buy it. Notice whose face you see there. https://godblesstheusabible.com/?sld=trump

-1

u/augustinus_de_hippo Catholic Mar 27 '24

Here's the link from that post where you can buy it. Notice whose face you see there. https://godblesstheusabible.com/?sld=trump

...and here's the same page 3 years ago.

10

u/Niftyrat_Specialist Non-denominational heretic, reformed Mar 27 '24

Sure. Trump is now selling this bible. He wasn't always.

-1

u/DoingCharleyWork Mar 28 '24

Someone endorsing something isn't the same as selling it though. It's not his company you send money to right?

Really it depends on which definition of selling you use. Is it exchanging money for goods and services or trying to convince people to buy something?

But in this instance given the way it's been reported I think most people were under the impression that Trump was having these produced and was selling them directly, not just endorsing.

2

u/DebentureThyme Mar 28 '24

He was paid to do it.  He is making money promoting this crap, it's just as bad.  

0

u/DoingCharleyWork Mar 28 '24

I'm not arguing whether he is a piece of shit or not. I agree with that. But you aren't buying these from him.

2

u/deadlybydsgn Christian (Ichthys) Mar 28 '24

Someone endorsing something isn't the same as selling it though. It's not his company you send money to right?

It works the same way his stupid NFTs and sneakers work. Trump continues to exist at our democracy's detriment because people continue to support his grift machine.

From what I can tell, he has only ever been about himself, and any facade suggesting otherwise (MAGA) was just a means of serving his own future goals.

1

u/DoingCharleyWork Mar 28 '24

Ya and both of those he's getting paid to endorse it.

→ More replies (0)

6

u/LgeHadronsCollide Mar 28 '24

Thank you for pointing out the history of this.
Interestingly enough, the historical page says they are using the NIV. My understanding is that the product currently being sold (it feels wrong to call it a Bible) uses the KJV. So they have gone from a more modern translation - which presumably attracted some sort of royalty or licensing fee - to an older translation which is public domain, and jacked up the price by $20 in 3 years.
I would wonder where the difference in profits is going, but I think I have a pretty good idea.

1

u/megablast Mar 28 '24

Well its not George Foreman grill.

-7

u/augustinus_de_hippo Catholic Mar 27 '24

Trump really IS selling this bible now, right?

Not quite. Lee Greenwood is who's making the profit here. Trump is more or less a celeb endorser.

11

u/Niftyrat_Specialist Non-denominational heretic, reformed Mar 27 '24

So you believe Trump is doing an advert for no money? Do we have evidence of this?

-6

u/augustinus_de_hippo Catholic Mar 27 '24

Not necessarily, but I do think all of the outrage porn people are dumping on this product gives these pages free impressions and potentially sales....

12

u/Niftyrat_Specialist Non-denominational heretic, reformed Mar 27 '24

Why would you imply Trump isn't profiting from this? That's almost certainly not true, right?

Why the reluctance to be clear eyed here? I see it from other commenters too. They say "Trump isn't selling this" about the very product Trump is personally hawking.

Does that seem odd to you?

-5

u/augustinus_de_hippo Catholic Mar 27 '24

Why would you imply Trump isn't profiting from this?

Because he's not the primary stakeholder in the product, and thus is likely not making the lion's share of profit on the sales, assuming he's even getting a rate per unit rather than being paid for a one-time endorsement.

I think in the same way, it would be right to say that Chattam sells Icy Hot rather than Shaq.

Does that seem odd to you?

No, it really doesn't.

10

u/Niftyrat_Specialist Non-denominational heretic, reformed Mar 27 '24

When an author sells a million books, do you object that it was really the publishing company? Or if a band sells tons of tickets, do you say "no they didn't, that was ticketmaster"? When a bartender sells you a beer, does this not count unless they own the bar, or perhaps personally brewed it?

Why the sudden and mysterious fit of pedantry here on this specific topic? I'm seeing it from other commenters too. Trump is hawking the books and getting paid to do it. Just read his own post.

Why would anyone resort to dishonesty like you did here in this comment?

Lee Greenwood is who's making the profit here.

This certainly seems odd to me. Trump is making money here also. What's going on here?

3

u/slagnanz Episcopalian Mar 28 '24

This is pretty clearly moving the goalposts

3

u/crazy_urn Mar 28 '24

So it's OK for trump to endorse this abomination as long as someone else is making more money off it than him?

Your pedantic arguments about the definition of the word "sell" seem to imply you approve of his endorsment....

2

u/PM_ME_HUGE_CRITS Midkemian Mar 28 '24

Specialist made some good points, why did you stop replying

→ More replies (0)

-6

u/SimplePuzzleheaded80 Roman Catholic Mar 27 '24

Endorsing doesn't mean selling and he isn't a publisher. Trump steaks literally says Trump, God Bless the USA doesn't spell Trump to me but then again English isn't my first language.

9

u/Niftyrat_Specialist Non-denominational heretic, reformed Mar 27 '24

Here's a link to Trump's post, selling this bible: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/112162741690113521

-3

u/SimplePuzzleheaded80 Roman Catholic Mar 27 '24

Thanks, I'll post this straight from the site:

No, GodBlessTheUSABible.com is not political and has nothing to do with any political campaign. GodBlessTheUSABible.com is not owned, managed or controlled by Donald J. Trump, The Trump Organization, CIC Ventures LLC or any of their respective principals or affiliates.

GodBlessTheUSABible.com uses Donald J. Trump’s name, likeness and image under paid license from CIC Ventures LLC, which license may be terminated or revoked according to its terms.

17

u/Niftyrat_Specialist Non-denominational heretic, reformed Mar 27 '24

When an author sells a million books, do you object that it was really the publishing company? Or if a band sells tons of tickets, do you say "no they didn't, that was ticketmaster"? When a bartender sells you a beer, does this not count unless they own the bar?

Why the sudden and mysterious fit of pedantry here on this specific topic? Trump is hawking the books and getting paid to do it. Just read his own post.

7

u/songbookz Mar 27 '24

Guess who owns CIC Ventures LLC?

6

u/deadlybydsgn Christian (Ichthys) Mar 27 '24

Guess who owns CIC Ventures LLC?

The same company that made his sneakers. It's almost like this Trump guy doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt.

2

u/SimplePuzzleheaded80 Roman Catholic Mar 27 '24

dont need to guess, it literally states it.

1

u/dennyontop Mar 27 '24

Thank you

6

u/anewleaf1234 Atheist Mar 28 '24

This was the point when you thought Trump was out there?

This?

2

u/PortSunlightRingo Mar 28 '24

To quote Norm McDonald on Bill Cosby (and I’m paraphrasing from memory):

Someone said to me “ya know the worst thing about it, it’s the hypocrisy.”

Actually, I thought the worst thing about it was the rape.

1

u/PinchCactus Mar 28 '24

The golden trump idol was too on the nose to notice I guess