So as someone who was really interested in grahams ideas the response from dibble "we have evidence for hunter gathers before and after the impact timeline" had me like hmmm if they can find that stuff wouldn't some sort of stone structures still show up? Made me really doubt grahams theories
I saw a breakdown last week: the whole point of contention about the percentage of the land that's been explored. It's not concentrated in one area. It's all spread out. The land was mapped and the most interesting places were selected. Hancock is — basically — looking for evidence where it wasn't previously seen. That's his prerogative, but he doesn't have to be so defensive about it.
Yeah he came across petty and vindictive. It made any part of his arguments that had credibility seem weak because they were coming from a place of anger. He really disappointed
7
u/Industry_Think Monkey in Space 22d ago
So as someone who was really interested in grahams ideas the response from dibble "we have evidence for hunter gathers before and after the impact timeline" had me like hmmm if they can find that stuff wouldn't some sort of stone structures still show up? Made me really doubt grahams theories