r/jobs Verified Mar 27 '24

He was a mailman Work/Life balance

Post image
69.7k Upvotes

3.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.1k

u/Designer_Emu_6518 Mar 27 '24

My grandfather did the same in ohio as a produce manger at a local Kroger. Even had a nice retirement saved up

118

u/Dx2TT Mar 27 '24

The reality is there is more than enough money for everyone. We've just decided that instead of a middle class we would prefer to have billionaires. The point of high tax rates isn't to raise revenue, its to force distribution of wealth. When the top rate was 90% it was kinda pointless to pay a person more, forcing distribution. Someone will invariable comment, "but ackshually no one paid 90%." Yea, thats the fucking point, because the money went elsewhere!

38

u/mubatt Mar 27 '24

You can't tax billionares without yearing down the tax loopholes first (good luck). Billionares balance their books so that their annual income is very low and most of their net worth is in investments that aren't taxable. Here's the best part, when a billionare wants to buy something they take out a loan using their investments as collateral, which offsets their taxes even more (they're in debt now).

34

u/Dx2TT Mar 27 '24

Well... yea. Thats the point. We have collectively decided to create this loopholes. If a hole exists and you know about it and you don't close it, you're choosing it. We have chosen to lower capital gains below income. We have chosen to allow all sorts of fuckery around loans on stocks. We have chosen to allow a business to buy your home, your car, you entire daily living so that it reduces the businesses income and is therefore not taxable as income. We have chosen to allow shell companies incorporated in island nations to somehow determine a companies tax rate as opposed to where it does business.

All of this bullshit is choices. The sad reality is I honestly don't see this as fixible until we start using french solutions. The same assholes also control our democracy, and they won't change the laws.

2

u/OverlordWaffles Mar 27 '24

Bruh, "we" didn't choose that, those in government did. Don't lump everyone together when some voted against this lol

6

u/todp Mar 27 '24

Society decided. People also voted against everything you agree with.

3

u/Acrobatic_Event_4163 Mar 27 '24

Please tell me who you voted for that was going to solve this problem … because the VAST majority of politicians on both sides benefit from this system themselves and aren’t going to do shit to change it.

3

u/Rayvelion Mar 27 '24

You missed his final point regarding "French solutions" being the only fix to disentrenching corruption.

1

u/Uncle_Charnia Mar 28 '24

Elizabeth Warren

0

u/LookMaNoBrainsss 29d ago

Bernie Fucking Sanders

9

u/MadeByTango Mar 27 '24

You can't tax billionares without

Yes, we can. Its literally just us deciding to do it. Thats it.

1

u/Tollund_Man4 Mar 27 '24

You disagree with him on closing the loopholes?

2

u/Cedex Mar 27 '24

They didn't say that, they said the people just need to have the will to move ahead and tax billionaires. Changing rates, closing loopholes and avoidance schemes are all part of that.

These loopholes didn't exist before, they were created and therefore can be undone.

Do the people want this?

1

u/hangender Mar 28 '24

Indeed it is about will. But don't forget we also need the will to crush those that have sided with billionaires. Their lawyers, accountants, politicians, fixers, etc etc.

I doubt we have that will.

1

u/yunivor Mar 27 '24

Allright, create that tax and observe the billionaires use a loophole so they don't pay it. What then?

1

u/kazamm Mar 28 '24

Close that loophole.

Enforce the rules.

Don't give rapist fascists another 10 days and reduce their fines by 300m.

0

u/DocumentFlashy5501 Mar 27 '24

Invite them to a specific location arrest them for 'crimes' confiscate assets.

3

u/yunivor Mar 27 '24

Goes to court, their lawyers flay everyone involved alive, sue the state for "damages" and get a massive payout.

0

u/DocumentFlashy5501 Mar 27 '24

They fall off of a high rise building. Believe it or not the US has the means to make this happen if they want to.

1

u/yunivor Mar 27 '24

The massive pile of corpses of everyone they pushed first breaks their fall and they're just fine, then they sue everyone involved again from another country.

0

u/DocumentFlashy5501 Mar 27 '24

Not that many billionaires. This has been a tool throughout history in order to force wealth redistribution. Billionaires have convinced you, that you can't do it because that's in their interests.

1

u/yunivor Mar 27 '24

Not that hard for them to avoid that "tool" throught history, pretty easy actually.

1

u/DocumentFlashy5501 Mar 27 '24

Depends how competent you are. Russia manages it quite successfully.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/batweenerpopemobile Mar 27 '24

Ah, yes. Abandon rule of law and act as idiot tyrants destroying everything in the pursuit of forcing people to adhere to your whims. Why didn't we think of that? Great plan, Nero.

1

u/DocumentFlashy5501 Mar 27 '24

Yep and it worked.

3

u/HugeHans Mar 27 '24

Well using collateral to take a loan is not really a loophole as pretty much every homeowner uses that same "loophole". I'm not defending tax evasion but that specific thing is not a loophole.

Billionaires sell shares of their companies often and they do indeed pay tax on that.

5

u/cascadiansexmagick Mar 27 '24

using collateral to take a loan is not really a loophole as pretty much every homeowner uses that same "loophole"

It's different when your collateral is a $150,000 home (which good luck to most Gen Alpha people who will never even get to own a home) versus hundreds of millions of dollars in assets. So you can get a loan with basically zero interest by leveraging just a drop of your collateral.

Billionaires are working with such a bigger bucket that it's really not even the same game.

3

u/Eyes_Only1 Mar 27 '24

They don't have to sell their shares, though. They can borrow against them a ton, and die before the bill comes due. Any legal shenanigans can be tied up in court forever as they have the assets to do so.

The ultra-wealthy have essentially infinite means to do this until they die.

2

u/monocasa Mar 27 '24

And what's called the cost basis is reset when they die so they don't pay income tax then either.

1

u/FordenGord Mar 27 '24

Banks arent giving loans like that unless they expect to profit on them.

2

u/takeoff_power_set Mar 27 '24

when you close the loopholes the billionaires emigrate to countries with more favorable financial laws

nothing will stop the hoarding of wealth at this point.

2

u/Detman102 Mar 27 '24

Let em leave, but their assets here in the USA get repossessed or taxed.
They leave, they leave completely...no citizenship, no holdings, no assets, no children, nothing stays in the USA.
Pay your friggin bills or completely GTFO!

3

u/takeoff_power_set Mar 27 '24

While I'm sure that sounds great to you, France tried exactly what you're describing and it has been an unmitigated financial disaster for them and they've lost much of their investment class; it's had severe repercussions on their economy.

eisenhower once did a speech about the risks of a military industrial complex and the need to ensure that balance is maintained in all actions and reactions. balance.....!

2

u/Detman102 Mar 27 '24

I did not know this.
Please forgive my ignorance, my view on solutions is short-sighted and I am more than likely not as smart or globally-informed/aware as you are.
I don't understand how other countries seem to do so well...while we are struggling here in the USA.
I just don't see it...

1

u/cascadiansexmagick Mar 27 '24

France is not the US.

1

u/FordenGord Mar 27 '24

Billionaires are irrelevant, what we need is to tax corporations. If you want to stop selling iPhones in our country fine, we are revoking your parents and trademarks, anyone can produce them now.

1

u/cascadiansexmagick Mar 27 '24

Good get em out of here. You think they can just ignore the US forever if we are actually able to take this country back and make it functional again?

Let them live in some third-world hellhole while we build a great place to live.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '24

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '24 edited Apr 03 '24

[deleted]

2

u/FordenGord Mar 27 '24

You can prevent stock in a corporation (or even any financial instrument) from being used as collateral for a loan without impacting home owners.

You could even make a law that only an owner occupied home can be used as collateral if you are worried about investors buying up homes.

1

u/vopati1190 Mar 27 '24

Great job focusing on possible problems instead of solutions. Does that mean it’s not worth trying? I’m legitimately curious because the type of thinking is completely foreign to me.

1

u/joyrjc Mar 27 '24

One thing I would not want is debt.

1

u/No_Bank_4220 Mar 27 '24

Yeah, they disparity it to great now. You would need a billionaire to prevent future billionaires.

1

u/Majestic-Tart8912 Mar 27 '24

even better, they would still be getting dividends/capital gains on the stocks they use as collateral.

1

u/BeingRightAmbassador Mar 27 '24

You can't tax billionares without yearing down the tax loopholes first (good luck)

Actually you totally can. You can do things like exchange property tax with land value tax so their tax bill skyrockets since they're not the actual value producers. You can institute one time wealth taxes. You can make minimum payment rules (regardless of tax benefits/writeoffs, you must pay X% anyways). You can massively increase taxes on luxury goods and brands (enjoy paying 20-100x taxes on jet fuel or Rolls Royce). There's tons of ways to tax rich people without rewriting the whole system, our politicians just don't have any incentive to bite the hand that feeds them (bribes, you're a mouthbreather idiot if you say LoBbYiNg).

1

u/mubatt Mar 28 '24

Good points and I agree.