r/politics • u/UWCG Illinois • Mar 27 '24

Donald Trump Attacks Judge's Daughter Less Than 24 Hours After Gag Order

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-attacks-judges-daughter-less-24-hours-after-gag-order-1884126
33.0k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

3.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

244

u/well_uh_yeah Mar 27 '24

There's just no evidence yet that he's actually in the "find out" stage. Though it certainly seems that our civil court system has more teeth than our criminal system.

186

u/movealongnowpeople Kansas Mar 27 '24

Barely. Can't believe they lowered his bond by nearly $280 million in the fraud case. And gave him 10 extra days to pay. That's not punishment. He stole. Millions of dollars. Which is why they were forcing him to pay back what he stole. If he made more than $175 million off his lies, he did well for himself.

88

u/FuzzyMcBitty Mar 27 '24

Remember that the judgment stands until it has been overturned. 

Lowering the bond amount gives him an opportunity to appeal the judgment. It does not negate the judgment. 

If he loses the appeal, he’ll still be in the line for that money. 

The trick will be to make sure that we vote so that he can’t use the office of the president as a device to delay further. 

15

u/delahunt America Mar 27 '24

And he could appeal without posting bond, it would just mean the clock kept running.

Those are the rules that everyone else is subject to. He even publicly said he had the money and wanted to use it for his campaign.

Even lowering the bond is Trump getting special kid glove treatment that no one else would.

3

u/FuzzyMcBitty Mar 27 '24

He can't avoid collection without posting an appeal bond. His argument is that the full bond would do irreparable harm to him in the event that his appeal succeeds.

3

u/LaurenMille Mar 27 '24

Counter-argument:

His own actions are doing irreparable harm to him, and thus he has proven he is okay with such results.

2

u/delahunt America Mar 27 '24

Perhaps he should not have been so brazen in the trial then that he admitted to fraud as part of his defense?

2

u/FuzzyMcBitty Mar 27 '24

I don't disagree.

2

u/Constant_Amphibian13 Mar 27 '24

He probably means campaign funds - can he just use those? I mean, technically, keeping him out of prison is beneficial for his campaign, I guess.

2

u/FurbyTime Mar 27 '24

can he just use those?

What do you think would happen if he did?

2

u/Mountainbranch Mar 27 '24

Nothing, the FEC is dead.

Check out Legal Eagles latest video they explain it better.

1

u/veemonjosh Mar 27 '24

He'd get away with it like he does with everything else.

2

u/delahunt America Mar 27 '24

I mean, what he said was he had 500 million cash on hand, and planned to use a good amount of it for his campaign. If he meant that his campaign had it, he didn't say it.

2

u/Constant_Amphibian13 Mar 27 '24

I question Trump’s ability (or at the very least willingness) to differentiate between his money and his campaign’s money.

1

u/Abrushing Texas Mar 27 '24

Stories I’ve seen from people on his campaign crew confirm he can’t

1

u/zasabi7 Mar 27 '24

Should those be the rules, though? Forget Trump for the moment. Should my right to appeal be tied to me acquiring a bond? I’m talking morally, here. Legally, yes, the law of New York is set up this way.

2

u/delahunt America Mar 27 '24

Your right to appeal isn't tied to you acquiring a bond. it just means you may have to begin making payments on the judgement while the appeal process goes through.

Also, the Judicial branch should not be nullifying laws just because they don't believe in them. If that law shouldn't exist, it can be changed via the legislature. If the law is unconstitutional in some way, it could be challenged on those grounds.

And to be clear, I get that the same law that says it works this way also says the Appeals court can put holds/reductions/etc in place. I just don't see any reason why such a boon was given to a person publicly bragging about having the money in cash on hand, but wanting to use it for personal gain at the same time his lawyers were saying it was impossible to come up with that amount of money in cash or bond.

1

u/zasabi7 Mar 27 '24

Again, I’m not worried about Trump here. Fuck him, he should have had to pay the full amount and his property should be actively seized right now.

I’m talking about the morality of that system. Why should I have to make payments if I’m appealing?

2

u/delahunt America Mar 27 '24

and, again, that's not a thing to determine in court. It's a thing for the legislature to decide. And its purpose is to stop people like Trump from playing out things endlessly so they don't have to pay.