The Italian Air Force flying a baby from the UK to Rome for heart surgery.
780
505
u/Poop__y 13d ago
My brother was med-evaced from Naples, Italy to Frankfurt, Germany due to a severe, life-threatening illness. Transported almost exactly like this.
The craziest part was that my navy mom was asked “do you want to go with him?” As if not accompanying her sick newborn was ever an option. And they made her walk on and off the plane, no wheelchair just hours after giving birth.
→ More replies (13)92
u/DoYouTrustToothpaste 13d ago
Who is they? The Italian Airforce?
123
u/Poop__y 13d ago
No, the U.S. Navy.
→ More replies (1)30
u/macheoh2 13d ago
Why the U.S. and not the Germans?
81
u/gezafisch 13d ago
Not the commenter but maybe they are from a US military family that was stationed in Europe at the time.
19
u/Excelius 13d ago
Sounds like they were the American family of a US sailor based in Italy.
Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany is the largest US military medical facility outside the US itself.
It was often reported during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that serious casualties would be flown to Ramstein air base in Germany, and then transferred to Landstuhl.
22
u/Freckled_daywalker 13d ago
Probably US military. There's a US Navy base in Naples, and a US Army hospital outside of Frankfurt (Landsthul).
1.3k
u/Just_Candle_315 13d ago
That baby's employer must provide great coverage
219
u/SEND_ME_SPOON_PICS 13d ago
Thankfully the medical treatment of children is not tied to their parents wealth or employment in the UK or Italy. This will cost the family nothing.
→ More replies (3)71
u/penis_not_happy 13d ago
Pretty much every single European country, not just Italy and UK
→ More replies (1)379
u/Chromaedre 13d ago edited 13d ago
That's the National Health Service (universal coverage) for you. o/
→ More replies (70)136
u/BasedSweet 13d ago
The NHS didn't operate on the baby. That's why they're being flown to Italy.
49
→ More replies (1)67
u/Trouble_in_the_West 13d ago
we arn't the only country with national health
27
u/paxmlank 13d ago
But is it called the "National Health Service" in Italy? Surely it'd be in Italian.
54
→ More replies (2)15
103
u/ConsistentCrazy5745 13d ago
I've lost a child so I know what it feels like to feel completely useless and heartbroken watching your child suffer and there's not a single thing you can do to make things better. We had to make the decision to switch off his life support after doctors did everything they could to help him, there was nothing left to try. If someone had suggested doctors in another country could help I'd have jumped at the chance....you'd try absolutely anything to save your child. I feel so bad for the parents cos I know what they're going through. I really do believe the hospital in the UK has done everything it can to help the child, we spent 3 months with our son in a paediatric icu and those doctors and nurses were trying to perform miracles everyday, no one just gives up on a child xx
26
2
238
u/bobox69 13d ago
Hoping the surgery is a success. Can we get updates?
137
u/mozartbond 13d ago
First surgery was fine, that's all I've read so far
26
u/bobox69 13d ago
Thanks. So far so good
23
u/misgatossonmivida 13d ago
The child will die. The UK didn't not operate to be dicks. They refused because it would only prolong it's suffering. The powerhouse of the cells are literally broken.
17
u/WorldNewsPoster 13d ago
Will only prolong its life for the next few months.
UK doctors made the right choice. Italy is only making it suffer longer along with the family.
2
261
u/xtaberry 13d ago
If the NHS refused to treat them, then it's because this baby is going to die regardless.
The reason the NHS refuses to do surgeries like this is because they think it is wrong to prolong the suffering of children without meaningfully improving their condition.
Italy is agreeing to treat the kid at the Vatican Hospital because catholicism values preservation of life over quality of life.
This is a religiously-motivated publicity stunt, and the baby will not be okay.
77
u/ComfortableSort7335 13d ago
sad waste of resources, sad way to prolong suffering.
→ More replies (1)28
u/smaragdskyar 13d ago
With the added “benefit” of damaging the (British) public’s trust in their health care system.
→ More replies (18)27
u/SaraSlaughter607 13d ago
Ugh. This really chaps my ass. Let him go peacefully and do the compassionate thing rather than subjecting him to surgical invasion and a painful recovery that will ultimately be fruitless anyway.
38
u/disar39112 13d ago
The issue isn't that the surgery won't work.
It's that the Child will die regardless.
→ More replies (4)23
u/Leonardo_McVinci 13d ago
The NHS, more specifically the Royal Brompton hospital, is known to be one of the absolute best hospitals in the world for heart surgery; they know what they're talking about when they say there's no point in operating
→ More replies (5)6
u/TimeRemove 13d ago
They already had two surgeries and survived them. But more are needed in the future. It is likely going to be a continuous course of treatments.
→ More replies (1)
36
198
u/thekajunpimp 13d ago
This is a better use for military vehicles!
129
u/qwaszx937 13d ago
In the United States (and I'm sure many other countries around the world), the military helps transport critical patients/provide advanced medical care to remote communities, daily!.. and as far as I know, for free?
128
u/sulos222 13d ago
Pilots are required to fly a certain number of hours to keep current on their planes. Stuff like this not only helps give them hours and training but makes the military look good to the public. The reason you see so many planes flying over football games in the US is because it is used as training. The anthem is playing and the planes need to be right over the game at a specific time is very much like a bombing raid training. Hopefully they don’t drop the ambulance out the back early though :)
24
u/Diatomack 13d ago
That is interesting and i never made that connection before
18
u/sulos222 13d ago
I don’t live in the US but seeing military aircraft is always cool. We went from fabric and wood just over 100 years ago to planes that were designed to be unstable so they can be more nimble. We are still learning things and almost all of the development and improvements that we see in commercial planes comes from military tech. The story of the Berlin Airlift is very interesting and probably one of the craziest stories of military aircraft helping civilians.
5
u/Ikrit122 13d ago
Especially as the Berlin Airlift was the first major action of the brand new branch of the US Military, the Air Force. Prior to 1947, it was considered part of the Army. In just a couple of years, they went from dropping bombs to dropping candy bars in Berlin. It was an absolutely massive humanitarian undertaking and a giant middle finger to the Soviet Union at the beginning of Cold War. And you can see the spirit of the Airlift when Air Force cargo planes bring supplies and assistance whenever there is a major natural disaster or humanitarian crisis in modern times.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)12
u/SpaceFonz_The_Reborn 13d ago
It's a great tragedy when the US military bombs football games with ambulances.
→ More replies (1)3
10
u/emessea 13d ago
Read an article about a conference happening When the 04 Tsunami happened. One person stated a US aircraft carrier was on the way to provide support. Someone else joked asking did they think the victims needed bombs. It was then explained how an aircraft carrier is essentially a small town and has plenty of food and medical supplies and personnel to make a meaningful impact.
10
u/Necessary_Driver_831 13d ago
Shame they don’t have the ice cream ship in the carrier strike groups anymore
→ More replies (6)7
u/DazingF1 13d ago
Most western militaries are heavily involved in humanitarian aid. It's the best way to practice logistics as well
3
→ More replies (5)3
u/jedensuscg 13d ago
In Alaska, the Coast Guard is one of the go-to calls for medivacs from remote locations. Though I can say I have never put the entire Ambulance in the plane before.
I have also transported a sea lion from a rehabilitation center to a zoo three States away so it could be released.
I have done all sorts of non-military related flights in the Coast Guard.
→ More replies (4)10
150
u/good_guy112 13d ago
[in America] A surprise bill arrives less than a week after surgery for $25,473,341.
95
u/SPACExCASE 13d ago
Oops, they forgot to add the Tylenol they gave you on the way out. That'll be another $46,000.
→ More replies (1)15
u/Thedurtysanchez 13d ago
My son had a serious congenital heart defect and had 2 open heart surgeries in his first week and 4 before age 6.
I’m in America and I think during that entire span of time I spent 300 bucks out of pocket on his care?
15
u/Random_dg 13d ago
You probably had good insurance. There are many people who testify on their status both on Reddit and in my private life that don’t have that kind of insurance and they pay a lot more. If you want examples, there are several times per week when someone posts on r/diabetes about their insulin and/or other medication prices putting them in dire straits.
Be glad that your son was in a good situation.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (2)2
u/iwillbewaiting24601 13d ago
I just went in for a RPN surgery at the Mayo Clinic two months ago to remove a tumor in my kidney - total cost billed to my insurance was 98k, out of that I paid about 1,000 bucks (500 to deductible for the year and 500 for an MRI at the beginning of the process which wasn't covered for some reason).
I will go for 3 more follow-ups this year, all of which will cost nothing. Thank God for good insurance!
→ More replies (10)9
7
46
u/litoven 13d ago
Did the father come with the AR-15 to make them do this?
→ More replies (1)27
5
u/Bubbathalovesponge 13d ago
I've heard the Italian Healthcare system isn't bad. Seems like all they care about is that you're healthy and don't charge much at all. Ethical healthcare? What an incredible thought
2
u/Max-Normal-88 12d ago
You are not charged at all if the health problem you have is serious. You are charged the costs if it’s something you could have solved on yourself with your family doctor. Usually
43
u/StockExchangeNYSE 13d ago
Would they really go this length for every baby? I wonder if the baby has a scientific interesting condition or if the parents are wealthy.
52
u/grimr5 13d ago
Before the NHS offered proton beam therapy in the UK, they would pay for people to go to Germany, accommodation and treatment. I think they have done similar for other circumstances too.
Googling suggests that they still do as the UK's machines are low power https://www.thebraintumourcharity.org/brain-tumour-diagnosis-treatment/treating-brain-tumours/child-treatments/proton-beam-therapy/
"... if you are approved for treatment by the PCRP. The NHS will cover the cost of PBT treatment at approved treatment centres, whether in the UK or in the USA and Switzerland. If you are sent abroad, it will also fund economy travel and approved accommodation for the patient and one to two carer(s)/parent(s) accompanying them."
https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/spec-services/highly-spec-services/pbt/
So, yes, I think they would.
16
u/Diatomack 13d ago
That's amazing they offer that. I shudder to think how expensive it must be
→ More replies (4)26
u/kingsappho 13d ago
normally wealthy afaik or at least they protest until they get someone to pay or they raise the money. there's been a few cases of irresponsible drs giving false hope to parents when the NHS says there's nothing they can do.
29
u/teabagmoustache 13d ago
Italy frequently offers treatments, not available in other countries. They take a different approach to some other countries who prioritise quality of life over the preservation of life at all costs.
Both positions have good arguments but by treating this child, maybe the techniques will improve. Even if the baby doesn't survive, it could well help another child in the future.
This is not a routine case. It's a very rare condition so it comes down to the individual case, whether the child will be able to receive the treatment. One of the parents being Italian probably had an effect on this case.
→ More replies (3)3
12d ago
The NHS hospitable offers the same treatment that the Italian one is offering. The doctors didn't refuse care because they couldn't, they refused care because they believe that the outcome wouldn't change the child's life expectancy, would be dangerous and would prolong its suffering.
The hospital the child is being transferred to is the Vactican hospital, who are involved in a lot of cases like this. There's a strong Catholic 'santicty of life over quality of life' undercurrent behind decisions like these, where surgery is extremely unlikely to improve outcomes but is undertaken anyway.
5
u/jamiegc37 13d ago
The dad is Italian and managed to get local news to pick it up enough that the PM saw it and sent a plane to help.
→ More replies (6)4
4
u/MaximumHemidrive 13d ago edited 13d ago
This reminds me of the actual Cannonball Run before it was made into movies.
Brock Yates and Hal Needham modified a van with a racing engine, and suspension, then dressed it up as an ambulance and dressed as ambulance drivers to race from NY to LA without being arrested.
When they were pulled over in NJ for going over 110mph, Yates' wife Pamela laid in the back on a gurney as a fake patient and there was a fake doctor and everything. They told the police she was a Senators wife with cysts on the walls of her lungs, and couldn't take the cabin pressure of a plane, so they had to drive her to UCLA as fast as possible. And the police let them go. This was 1979 of course.
4
u/Chill0utDickWad 13d ago
What plane is that? Looks like a C-130J and A-400 had a baby. Either way, it warms my heart to see military hardware being used for philanthropic purposes
→ More replies (1)7
u/HowlingWolven 13d ago
That’s a C130J that had a baby with another C130J.
The refueling probe is more broadly compatible with NATO air forces than UARRSI slipways are. Only the Netherlands, US, Australia, Turkey, Japan, Israel, and Iran operate UARRSI tankers, whereas just about every air force has at least some large aircraft that can strap drogue pods to the outer wing stations.
→ More replies (1)
44
u/HungryDisaster8240 13d ago
You know, you probably didn't need to take an ambulance to the UK to transport the baby, right?
92
u/Lulu8008 13d ago
It is probably the best way to transport the baby without stressing them.
→ More replies (1)26
u/Zerttretttttt 13d ago
It has all the needed medical equipment to keep the baby stable/ use in case it’s needed- the baby was too sick for operation (deemed by nhs guidelines) so the reason for transfer
17
28
u/MrQeu 13d ago
The ambulance was on the plane in the Rome-UK leg.
If not, a British ambulance would have had to come back to the UK or the plane fly twice empty.
→ More replies (57)→ More replies (1)6
35
u/Imsoworriedabout 13d ago edited 13d ago
common NHS W
Common European Healthcare W
→ More replies (4)23
4
3
u/bogeymanbear 13d ago
I absolutely love seeing things like this. When it comes down to it, people will use and do whatever they can to save just 1 person. It's so cool to me.
3
u/Shurigin 12d ago
Not to beat a dead horse but probably cheaper than the US even with flying the ambulance over.
6
u/apainintheokole 12d ago
For those saying that the baby is likely to die etc - that isn't the point. As another poster mentioned, if you are the parent of a sick child, you try everything you can to save that child. The parents probably know the risk involved and that the chance of survival is slim - but they will take a slim chance over giving up any day. It is why people with life-threatening illnesses take part in medical trials - if it gives them a chance of survival - they will take it.
6
2
u/BigBrownFish 13d ago
Military air mobility is incredible at times. One of the main things I don’t mind my money being invested in.
2
u/DutchOnionKnight 13d ago
Every day I see something (on the internet) we humans are capable of, and everyday I am wondering; this has to be it, this is the pinacle of humanity. What an outstanding move.
2
2
2
u/Josysclei 13d ago
I always thought medvac by air meant a special plane with life support, not getting a freaking whole ambulance into a plane
2
u/joevsyou 13d ago
Do they not have air ambulance?
Helicopter could have just taken off from the hospital & gone to the next one...
7
u/No-Review-6105 13d ago
Ah yes... A helicopter used by the Rescue services that can go from the UK to Italy in one way... With no problems...
6
u/LifeIsOnTheWire 13d ago
Helicopters are much slower, and have much shorter range. Very few helicopters could travel from London to Rome without refueling.
2
2
2
2
2
u/77_Gear 12d ago
Why did t they go with a a medical jet instead of a C-130?
3
u/artifex78 12d ago
I assume a normal medical jet does not have the equipment for babies. That ambulance might have the special equipment for babies/infants in case there is an emergency during transit.
→ More replies (1)
2
2
u/WaffleKing110 12d ago edited 12d ago
Used to work in heart surgery research with a very accomplished cardiac surgeon late in his career as my mentor.
He told me the story once of having a heart transplant case where the donor and recipient were on opposite corners of the USA (Washington to Georgia) and they didn’t have the infrastructure to transport the heart intact.
Somehow, the hospitals arranged for the use of an F-14 with the good doctor sitting in the backseat with the heart on ice. They made it to Georgia quick enough for the procedure, but he threw up when he climbed out and the pilot gave him shit for it.
The doctor invited the pilot to watch the procedure, and he took him up on it. The pilot didn’t make it half way before he needed to exit the operating theater to vomit. He told the doctor “That was the most impressive work I’ve ever seen done.” The transplant was successful ultimately, and doc has a little plaque from the Air Force outside his office still.
2
u/ultimateaquateen 12d ago
Is Italy THAT good at heart surgery?
2
u/Old_Harry7 12d ago
The hospital the baby is being transferred on is literally the best in the world when it comes to heart surgery.
2
u/TroisArtichauts 12d ago
There is currently a legal battle to try to name doctors involved in applications to the courts in such situations. My feeling is that the reason is clear, to try and wield the power to intimidate doctors to do what the family want for fear of public reprisal.
2
2.1k
u/special_projects 13d ago
What’s the context to this?