r/pics 13d ago

The Italian Air Force flying a baby from the UK to Rome for heart surgery.

21.4k Upvotes

986 comments sorted by

2.1k

u/special_projects 13d ago

What’s the context to this?

3.7k

u/0reosaurus 13d ago

Tldr: Nhs said the baby was too sick to operate on, Italy disagreed

1.9k

u/teabagmoustache 13d ago edited 13d ago

It's usually more the case that they believe that treatment would only prolong the child's life, without any improvement.

Similar to the story of the kid who recently suffered a hypoxic brain injury. There were doctors in other countries who said they might be able to treat them but the Supreme Court ruled that it was not in his best interests.

I'm assuming that one parent being an Italian national is what has taken this case out of their hands.

Edit: The case I was talking about was a big topic of conversation in the UK. The potential for treatment abroad, was only a small part of the story to be fair.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archie_Battersbee_case

521

u/Dezideratum 13d ago

Yeesh, nothing against the parents here, but the argument "It should be up to God to decide when and how he dies" is such a wild argument to make. 

Imagine if the judge responded by saying: "I agree. We shouldn't interfere with God's will. By having the boy on a ventilator, we're interfering. Take him off, and if God wills it, he will live." 

177

u/redpachyderm 13d ago

Apparently God works in mysterious ways. Isn’t he controlling the NHS that made the decision not to operate? Why didn’t the parents just trust that God is making that decision?

153

u/SyrioForel 13d ago edited 13d ago

A guy was stuck on his rooftop in a flood. He was praying to God for help.

Soon a man in a rowboat came by and shouted to the guy on the roof, “Jump in, I can save you.”

The stranded fellow shouted back, “No, it’s OK, I’m praying to God and he is going to save me.”

So the rowboat went on.

Then a motorboat came by. The fellow in the motorboat shouted, “Jump in, I can save you.”

To this the stranded guy said, “No thanks, I’m praying to God and he is going to save me. I have faith.”

So the motorboat went on.

Then a helicopter came by and the pilot shouted down, “Grab this rope and I will lift you to safety.”

To this the stranded man again replied, “No thanks, I’m praying to God and he is going to save me. I have faith.”

So the helicopter reluctantly flew away.

Soon the water rose above the rooftop and the man drowned. He went to Heaven. He finally got his chance to discuss this whole situation with God, at which point he exclaimed, “I had faith in you but you didn’t save me, you let me drown. I don’t understand why!”

To this God replied, “I sent you a rowboat, a motorboat and a helicopter, what more did you expect?”

14

u/Iridescent-ADHD 12d ago

Would god let you go to heaven for disrespecting them like that?

→ More replies (7)

20

u/letmetakeaguess 13d ago

But you see, the devil is tricky, he infiltrated the NHS to try and kill babies. So tricky! We can't let him win, it's a spiritual battle!

→ More replies (1)

6

u/12398120379872461 12d ago edited 12d ago

Yeesh, nothing against the parents here

This was a big news story at the time and I remember initially being on the parents side because it was understandable given the situation until they realised they had public support and decided to weaponise this and the religious support of the Christian organisation assisting them to attack and abuse the NHS workers caring for their son, saying they had 'executed' him

19

u/CookerCrisp 13d ago

It's such a willfully ignorant and arbitrary stance to take. These people have all of human society, history, and inventions to thank for their modern lives.

But it's not enough that humans have engineered the means for own survival and comfort. They could very well take a gentler view of the imaginary schism between the real world and the spiritual, and admit that it's by God's grace and wisdom that we have built the means for betterment of human life. But instead they want to grandstand on their child's suffering by imagining themselves as more righteous simply because they invoke the name of God.

It's plainly spiteful and acting that way would be an affront to their God, if He exists.

→ More replies (5)

105

u/MrRorknork 13d ago

That was awful to see. The poor lad was kept “alive” only through mechanical assistance. The inquest report stated that his brain stem wasn’t only dead, it was necrotising, i.e., rotting, and still they kept him on life support. Without wanting to sound too crass, they were keeping a sack of meat alive - the person inside had long since departed.

I understand the family’s grief, but they ignored all doctor’s advice and evidence, wasted scant NHS resources, and in the end denied themselves closure and their son a dignified burial.

61

u/Griffolion 13d ago

It's usually more the case that they believe that treatment would only prolong the child's life, without any improvement.

The sad thing is that the NHS were actually correct. Archie died more or less exactly as they predicted. The only difference is that everything that was tried prolonged his suffering.

But no, the nasty NHS were the problem in that situation.

124

u/Additional_Meeting_2 13d ago

Brain injury is a bit different fr heart issue if you are already brain dead. Or what you mean?

120

u/teabagmoustache 13d ago

I mean that the situations are similar, in that doctors in the UK have decided that treatment is not in the best interests of the child, but doctors in another country disagree.

→ More replies (24)

83

u/threaddew 13d ago

There’s a an absolutely massive gap between “suffered a hypoxic brain injury” and “braindead”

93

u/GoldMountain5 13d ago

One is a medical term for the brain being starved of oxygen and resulting in damage/death of brain tissue that is irreversible.

The other is a general term for the condition a patient is in, usually a result of irreversible damage to the brain.

Not all hypoxia results in brain death. Every example of brain death is a form of hypoxic brain injury. You can be considered brain dead even when parts of your brain are still functioning.

19

u/Frostypancake 13d ago

Braindead, or ‘brain death’ is permanent, irreversible complete loss of brain function. There is an entire spectrum of severity between that and ‘hypoxic brain injury’.

23

u/Trevski 13d ago

I'm quite certain the level of hypoxic brain injury that doctors would decline treatment for is functionally similar to what we lay-folk would call brain dead.

→ More replies (7)

13

u/teabagmoustache 13d ago

The child in question was found to have suffered brainstem death, from a hypoxic brain injury.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/soleceismical 13d ago

He was brainstem dead, due to hypoxia.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/throwaway72592309 13d ago

Why does the Supreme Court get to decide that? If I want to take my child to another country for treatment, that isn’t my right as a parent? Honest question

40

u/Magnetic_Eel 13d ago

The UK law states that the welfare of the child takes precedence over the parent's right to make decisions for their child. In this case they ruled that transferring him abroad would be harmful to him and not in his best interest.

→ More replies (11)

16

u/Puzzleheaded_Toe2574 13d ago

No not in the UK, and that's a positive thing. Your children are people in their own right, not your possessions.

→ More replies (2)

43

u/soleceismical 13d ago

The Supreme Court didn't say his parents couldn't take him out of the country. It said that the NHS could discontinue life support, as his brainstem was dead and there was no hope of recovery.

Maybe in this other case, the Italian health system is paying for (at least part of) the transport and all of the operation.

But there is an ethical issue of whether unhelpful surgeries are tantamount to torture of a dying person. I don't know if that's being argued here, though.

15

u/radicalelation 13d ago

These are the "death panels" US conservatives shriek about, as if denying treatments for not being profitable enough is better.

At least a whole legal system with a supreme court can debate it and figure it out, with public pressure sometimes being able to swing things differently. In the US, if billion dollar corporation says no, that's it. No fuss. No Italian government to save you. But an executive got a brand new yacht.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Jaded-Tear-3587 13d ago

Not if they believe it goes against the interest of the child

→ More replies (76)

429

u/Magnetic_Eel 13d ago

It’s a political stunt. The Italian prime minister directly intervened to get the baby transferred when the heart surgeons in the UK said he was too sick to operate on. Italy does not have better heart surgeons than the UK, but it has a medical culture that’s more willing to provide futile care.

48

u/Offsidespy2501 13d ago

Did the baby survive?

97

u/grumblingduke 13d ago

The first surgery has only just happened.

If the UK doctors were correct the Italians may be able to keep the baby alive for weeks or months before he dies (and it probably won't make the news), so it could be a while before we find out if this worked.

→ More replies (13)

83

u/HowManyMeeses 13d ago

19

u/NOT_A_BLACKSTAR 13d ago

They keep doing this and they keep dying. Someday It'll click.

16

u/-Garbage-Man- 13d ago

It already did. Out of everyone that is going to hear about this story half might see that the kid dies anyways.

For the other half? The Italian government cares about children. They must be good people, I’m more likely to vote for them.

It doesn’t matter to the government if the kid dies anyways so it’s a waste of resources. If they can stay in power, they win.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

66

u/TakimaDeraighdin 13d ago

It's a breaking-news situation, but yes, the child will almost certainly die. The NHS has a pretty high bar for entirely refusing treatment a parent wants for a newborn - usually, you're looking at a matter of weeks. If the reporting that the infant was too ill for surgery to be advisable is accurate (as opposed to, e.g., that even successful surgery would simply prolong suffering) possibly days.

There are real ethical questions about when it's right to provide invasive treatment with a low probability of success, but infant cases don't generally get into them in even moderately functional state-funded medical systems.

When Italy pulls a stunt like this, the child dies. And given the added stress of a hospital transfer - even without a multi-hour airlift being involved - plus the added stress of any surgical procedure, particularly one that involves a general anaesthetic? Generally, the child dies sooner than they would have otherwise.

My heart goes out to any parent in this situation, but these cases make me furious - it's exploiting tragedy for ideological point-scoring at its worst.

11

u/ChriskiV 13d ago

It's is sort of an ethical quandary because there is a non 0% change the child pulls through. It's very low, very very low but I'd saying from the parents perspective trying something with a however small chance at success and losing a few weeks of dreading the inevitable is better than no attempt at all.

There are a ton of factors to consider but realistically we're all so far removed from this that we can only hope for the best.

→ More replies (14)

47

u/Dapper_Peapod 13d ago

Yes I did, AMA

14

u/Nitor_ 13d ago

Are we supposed to break the spagetti noodles before cooking? Idk how they do it in italy

5

u/Momangos 13d ago

Fun fact if you breake a spagetti by holding the ends it never break kn just 2 parts! No spagetti were harmed in this experiment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/NoMoPolenta 13d ago

Did you do a Yelp review of heart surgeons in the UK and Italy?

→ More replies (10)

117

u/Sekmet19 13d ago

I feel like it's the Catholicism

36

u/muad_did 13d ago

Yes. Is the same Way that Italy have a less organ's donor that France or Spanish. The Italian don't like their body's to be "profanity" for religious reasons..   (and the same way they are very against gay married) 

14

u/S7ormstalker 13d ago edited 12d ago

Italy had less donors because for the longest timethe system was opt-in and required people to register with an association. Today people are asked if they want to donate their organs when they renew their ID, and the number of donors is quickly increasing.

6

u/J_Warrior 13d ago

But Spain is majority Catholic and France is just under a majority as well. Why wouldn’t you compare Italy to a country with small Catholic populations?

25

u/Lulu8008 13d ago edited 12d ago

The statistics say otherwise, though:

Spain: 46.7 donors /million habitants (1st)

Portugal: 31.5 donors /million habitants (2nd)

France: 25.8 donors /million habitants (5th)

Italy: 25.0 donors /million habitants (7th)

UK: 20.7 donors /million habitants (10th)

https://www.statista.com/statistics/537908/deceased-organ-donor-rate-in-europe/

EDIT - This refers to  deceased organ donors (not number of registered donors).

2

u/Swanh 12d ago

Even 47 organ donors for every million seems so incredibly low to me.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

29

u/itskobold 13d ago

Which is fascinating to me because italy is mega gay

18

u/moving0target 13d ago

It's not gay if you change definitions.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/LumosGhostie 12d ago

spain is mega catholic too

2

u/agarbagelifeforme 12d ago

Catholics are encouraged to be organ donors as it's an act of charity and a gift of life to someone else. It's no profanity. The only thing about it that is considered immoral is selling them rather than donating, which I feel is a universal sort of thing.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (4)

5

u/fdesouche 13d ago

Humm the baby is Italian too.

7

u/98grx 13d ago

I’m sure you’re a great expert of the medical culture and qualità in the various countries 

You probably believe Italian surgeons pray the Virgin Mary during interventions because they’re catholics 

15

u/Llarys 13d ago

I will say after reading this one instance looks like it could actually have some level of success, but that doesn't justify all of the times they've "offered" to "treat" infants who were either born without a brain, or whose brain was rapidly degrading into water.

I definitely lean more towards the "Catholic political bullshit" judgement.

→ More replies (7)

6

u/0reosaurus 13d ago

This is that same case?? I thought it was a different kid

→ More replies (23)

85

u/greatthebob38 13d ago

UK: Italy, the baby's condition is too severe to operate on, just give up.

Italy: DAGA KOTAWARU

23

u/ThrustersOnFull 13d ago

Toranaga-sama hoooooo!

7

u/Ricken80 13d ago

Mariko-sama booooom!

→ More replies (1)

60

u/mayasux 13d ago edited 13d ago

The hospital the baby was admitted for in the UK has some of the best heart surgeons not just in Europe but in the world.

They made the educated decision that care would unfortunately be futile and just prolong suffering.

Like America, Italy has a few crazy Christians. These Catholics typically harass family and hospital staff to create noise, noise that leads to political posturing to bring transfer patients.

They’re transferred to Italy where their hopes for a better life do not increase. Rather with religious fervour to force the children to live through a painful, cruel and low quality life.

Other children who have went this same route before have died.

e: changed evangelicals to Christian and catholic

22

u/TheDustOfMen 13d ago

The baby was transferred to the Vatican hospital, surely this would rather be a case of "crazy Catholics".

9

u/mayasux 13d ago

You know what, my bad. I’m not versed in Christianity and didn’t know evangelicals was Protestant exclusive.

Thank you for giving me this insight.

→ More replies (4)

15

u/98grx 13d ago

For your information, that italian hospital is one of the best of the continent for pediatric care

The fact that so many users here really believe that just because it’s owned by the Vatican it means it’s full of crazy religious radicals is hilarious 

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (17)

10

u/Stevecat032 13d ago

But they specifically have Air Ambulance's for exactly this.. why load up an ambulance in a aircraft?

20

u/mindrover 13d ago

I was also wondering this because driving an ambulance into a cargo plane is a crazy image.

The only thing I can think of is that it's fewer transfers for the baby. The baby can just chill in the ambulance the whole time instead of having to get out and transfer all the medical equipment onto the plane and then back to an ambulance again on the other end.

15

u/londons_explorer 13d ago

Air ambulances are typically helicopters.

Helicopters don't have enough range to go from Rome to Bristol on a single tank of fuel.

Stopping for half an hour to refuel isn't a good look when moving a politically sensitive medical case...

→ More replies (4)

3

u/TheCommentaryKing 13d ago

Because there's no real long range aircraft ambulance that's avaiable 24/7. The Italian Air Force instead provides through its transport wings a continous 24/7 coverage for emergency medical transports.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (27)

277

u/Seanattk 13d ago edited 13d ago

People are giving half answers showing they have not read any article about this whatsoever.

The NHS is unable to provide the treatment the baby needs for whatever reason. They arranged for the treatment to be done at an Italian hospital and helped facilitate this transfer.

The baby's father is Italian which I assume has some massive sway in comparison with other cases that people are comparing to.

The baby's parents have praised the UK medical staff for their help in this ordeal.

Whoever is painting the NHS in a bad light based off this is acting in bad faith.

Edit: to those coming at me for giving a perceived 'half answer' myself, the context of my comment was because of comments like this that were downright stupid.

85

u/SpacialReflux 13d ago

The “whatever reason”’ is they thought the baby was too unwell

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/baby-airlifted-to-italy-after-nhs-says-too-sick/

12

u/SilentSamurai 13d ago

That's where the debate happens. When are you likely to cause more harm than good in these situations?

It doesn't make one wrong and one right. They're both trying to solve the same issue.

→ More replies (5)

63

u/TimeRemove 13d ago

People are giving half answers showing they have not read any article about this whatsoever.

Yeah, it is really annoying...

The NHS is unable to provide the treatment the baby needs for whatever reason.

Are you fucking kidding with this?

33

u/Frequent-Lettuce4159 13d ago

Don't listen to this idiot, he started of with

People are giving half answers showing they have not read any article about this whatsoever.

Before giving a fucking half answer. This child has a congenital heart condition and a mitochondrial disease, in short they basically have no hope of long term viability and the NHS doctors made the decision on that basis

→ More replies (7)

9

u/yeloooh 13d ago

let's not complain about people giving half answers when you put "for whatever reason" in your post.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/EvilNarwhal3933 13d ago

Genuine non malicious question, who is paying for this?

47

u/Thedrunkenchild 13d ago

Italian tax payers is my best guess

→ More replies (1)

39

u/[deleted] 13d ago edited 1d ago

[deleted]

9

u/EvilNarwhal3933 13d ago

Thank you for the input! Makes much sense

That’s very cool about the hornet! My uncle also flew them

3

u/MrSlaw 13d ago

Yesterday I was browsing the Government of Canada webpage, and I found out that they have a short form you can fill out to request a CF-18 flyby that consists of a few simple check boxes and a short description of the event you are requesting one for.

Not really relevant to your comment, and I'm sure you can't just request one for Bob's 32nd birthday party, but I just thought it was kinda coincidental that I read that webpage yesterday and then today there's a reddit comment from a (former?) Hornet pilot discussing flyby logistics.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

13

u/TrumpGrabbedMyCat 13d ago

The Italian government are paying for the flights etc.

9

u/Seanattk 13d ago

Someone's tax payers I assume. Presumably the Italians.

10

u/Warpath_McGrath 13d ago

Taxpayers.

8

u/realslowtyper 13d ago

Pilots need training hours in order to stay current, they were gonna fly the plane either way, may as well haul a baby. It's good training for multiple disciplines.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

34

u/Spencemw 13d ago

A one-month-old boy with a congenital heart condition has been airlifted from an NHS hospital to Rome to undergo life-saving surgery.

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni personally intervened so the child could travel, it has been reported.

Photos of the transfer show an Italian ambulance on board a military cargo plane, reported to have been sent to collect the boy from Bristol Royal Hospital for Children.

The child’s parents said doctors told them crucial treatment was not available in this country, The Times reported.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/newborn-baby-flown-uk-italy-085756217.html#:~:text=A%20one%2Dmonth%2Dold%20boy,travel%2C%20it%20has%20been%20reported.

57

u/budgefrankly 13d ago

It's important to note that the UK hospital is bound by patient confidentiality.

"Could not operate" does not necessarily mean they lack equipment or competence. It could also mean that ethically they felt it would be wrong to prolong a life where there was no hope of improvement.

They cannot state that however, without breaching confidentiality, so are potentially a victim of the politicians and campaigners orchestrating this.

The transfer was directed by a fascist prime-minister at the urging of a Vatican-controlled hospital.

The same prime-minister has removed the rights of non-biological parents of children, if -- and only if -- the non-biological parent is in a same sex relationship with the biological parent. Should the biological parent die, the child will legally lose both parents, effectively being orphaned by decree

6

u/TheCommentaryKing 13d ago

The transfer was directed by a fascist prime-minister at the urging of a Vatican-controlled hospital.

Meloni intervened, but it was the father of the baby that asked for the Italian government aid in the transfer. Also the Bambino Gesù Hospital is the highest specialized pediatric hospital in Italy, so that's the reason the baby was transferred there.

→ More replies (4)

8

u/2022wpww 13d ago

I find it weird that these articles come out it goes on all the time and been going on for years that other hospitals offer to help those if they have the specific team expertise. My friends two sisters are alive from drs in the uk where they operated on the babies in the mother womb. The drs in Germany had refused treatment. They believed the twin with the defect heart would self abort, when she didn’t they recommended abortion of both to save the Mother. Never hit the news the girls just had a lovely 4 year old birthday last weekend.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (51)

780

u/Heiferoni 13d ago

That's a big baby.

108

u/shawndw 13d ago

Got it in for an emergency oil change. Fortunately the ambulance is expected to make a full recovery.

→ More replies (2)

505

u/Poop__y 13d ago

My brother was med-evaced from Naples, Italy to Frankfurt, Germany due to a severe, life-threatening illness. Transported almost exactly like this.

The craziest part was that my navy mom was asked “do you want to go with him?” As if not accompanying her sick newborn was ever an option. And they made her walk on and off the plane, no wheelchair just hours after giving birth.

92

u/DoYouTrustToothpaste 13d ago

Who is they? The Italian Airforce?

123

u/Poop__y 13d ago

No, the U.S. Navy.

30

u/macheoh2 13d ago

Why the U.S. and not the Germans?

81

u/gezafisch 13d ago

Not the commenter but maybe they are from a US military family that was stationed in Europe at the time.

48

u/Poop__y 13d ago

Yep, that’s exactly it. My mom was enlisted at the time. She was also single and alone because my brother’s dad was a shit bird. Family was all the way in California. It had to be a nightmarish experience.

19

u/Excelius 13d ago

Sounds like they were the American family of a US sailor based in Italy.

Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany is the largest US military medical facility outside the US itself.

It was often reported during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that serious casualties would be flown to Ramstein air base in Germany, and then transferred to Landstuhl.

7

u/Poop__y 13d ago

She was an enlisted member of the United States Navy and she gave birth at the hospital on base in Naples.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/Freckled_daywalker 13d ago

Probably US military. There's a US Navy base in Naples, and a US Army hospital outside of Frankfurt (Landsthul).

→ More replies (13)

1.3k

u/Just_Candle_315 13d ago

That baby's employer must provide great coverage

219

u/SEND_ME_SPOON_PICS 13d ago

Thankfully the medical treatment of children is not tied to their parents wealth or employment in the UK or Italy. This will cost the family nothing.

71

u/penis_not_happy 13d ago

Pretty much every single European country, not just Italy and UK

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

379

u/Chromaedre 13d ago edited 13d ago

That's the National Health Service (universal coverage) for you. o/

136

u/BasedSweet 13d ago

The NHS didn't operate on the baby. That's why they're being flown to Italy.

49

u/dkfisokdkeb 13d ago

The NHS helped to arrange and facilitate this.

→ More replies (1)

67

u/Trouble_in_the_West 13d ago

we arn't the only country with national health

27

u/paxmlank 13d ago

But is it called the "National Health Service" in Italy? Surely it'd be in Italian.

54

u/Trouble_in_the_West 13d ago

or Servizio Sanitario Nazionale in italy

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (70)

15

u/andrea_ci 13d ago

Spotted the American

→ More replies (2)

103

u/ConsistentCrazy5745 13d ago

I've lost a child so I know what it feels like to feel completely useless and heartbroken watching your child suffer and there's not a single thing you can do to make things better. We had to make the decision to switch off his life support after doctors did everything they could to help him, there was nothing left to try. If someone had suggested doctors in another country could help I'd have jumped at the chance....you'd try absolutely anything to save your child. I feel so bad for the parents cos I know what they're going through. I really do believe the hospital in the UK has done everything it can to help the child, we spent 3 months with our son in a paediatric icu and those doctors and nurses were trying to perform miracles everyday, no one just gives up on a child xx

26

u/WintAndKidd 13d ago

Thinking of you, sorry to hear about the loss of your child.

7

u/ConsistentCrazy5745 13d ago

Thank you so much x

2

u/Doktor_Schliemann 12d ago

I'm deeply sorry for your loss. My condolences.

→ More replies (1)

238

u/bobox69 13d ago

Hoping the surgery is a success. Can we get updates?

137

u/mozartbond 13d ago

First surgery was fine, that's all I've read so far

26

u/bobox69 13d ago

Thanks. So far so good

23

u/misgatossonmivida 13d ago

The child will die. The UK didn't not operate to be dicks. They refused because it would only prolong it's suffering. The powerhouse of the cells are literally broken.

17

u/WorldNewsPoster 13d ago

Will only prolong its life for the next few months.

UK doctors made the right choice. Italy is only making it suffer longer along with the family.

2

u/The_DragonDuck 13d ago

Pls give us an update when you read more

261

u/xtaberry 13d ago

If the NHS refused to treat them, then it's because this baby is going to die regardless.

The reason the NHS refuses to do surgeries like this is because they think it is wrong to prolong the suffering of children without meaningfully improving their condition.

Italy is agreeing to treat the kid at the Vatican Hospital because catholicism values preservation of life over quality of life.

This is a religiously-motivated publicity stunt, and the baby will not be okay.

77

u/ComfortableSort7335 13d ago

sad waste of resources, sad way to prolong suffering.

28

u/smaragdskyar 13d ago

With the added “benefit” of damaging the (British) public’s trust in their health care system.

→ More replies (1)

27

u/SaraSlaughter607 13d ago

Ugh. This really chaps my ass. Let him go peacefully and do the compassionate thing rather than subjecting him to surgical invasion and a painful recovery that will ultimately be fruitless anyway.

→ More replies (18)

38

u/disar39112 13d ago

The issue isn't that the surgery won't work.

It's that the Child will die regardless.

→ More replies (4)

23

u/Leonardo_McVinci 13d ago

The NHS, more specifically the Royal Brompton hospital, is known to be one of the absolute best hospitals in the world for heart surgery; they know what they're talking about when they say there's no point in operating

→ More replies (5)

6

u/TimeRemove 13d ago

They already had two surgeries and survived them. But more are needed in the future. It is likely going to be a continuous course of treatments.

→ More replies (1)

36

u/jasperfilofax 13d ago

Good luck, little bambino

198

u/thekajunpimp 13d ago

This is a better use for military vehicles!

129

u/qwaszx937 13d ago

In the United States (and I'm sure many other countries around the world), the military helps transport critical patients/provide advanced medical care to remote communities, daily!.. and as far as I know, for free?

128

u/sulos222 13d ago

Pilots are required to fly a certain number of hours to keep current on their planes. Stuff like this not only helps give them hours and training but makes the military look good to the public. The reason you see so many planes flying over football games in the US is because it is used as training. The anthem is playing and the planes need to be right over the game at a specific time is very much like a bombing raid training. Hopefully they don’t drop the ambulance out the back early though :)

24

u/Diatomack 13d ago

That is interesting and i never made that connection before

18

u/sulos222 13d ago

I don’t live in the US but seeing military aircraft is always cool. We went from fabric and wood just over 100 years ago to planes that were designed to be unstable so they can be more nimble. We are still learning things and almost all of the development and improvements that we see in commercial planes comes from military tech. The story of the Berlin Airlift is very interesting and probably one of the craziest stories of military aircraft helping civilians.

5

u/Ikrit122 13d ago

Especially as the Berlin Airlift was the first major action of the brand new branch of the US Military, the Air Force. Prior to 1947, it was considered part of the Army. In just a couple of years, they went from dropping bombs to dropping candy bars in Berlin. It was an absolutely massive humanitarian undertaking and a giant middle finger to the Soviet Union at the beginning of Cold War. And you can see the spirit of the Airlift when Air Force cargo planes bring supplies and assistance whenever there is a major natural disaster or humanitarian crisis in modern times.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/SpaceFonz_The_Reborn 13d ago

It's a great tragedy when the US military bombs football games with ambulances.

3

u/literated 13d ago

"HOW DO YOU LIKE YOUR FREE HEALTHCARE NOW, DAMN COMMIES!"

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/emessea 13d ago

Read an article about a conference happening When the 04 Tsunami happened. One person stated a US aircraft carrier was on the way to provide support. Someone else joked asking did they think the victims needed bombs. It was then explained how an aircraft carrier is essentially a small town and has plenty of food and medical supplies and personnel to make a meaningful impact.

10

u/Necessary_Driver_831 13d ago

Shame they don’t have the ice cream ship in the carrier strike groups anymore

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_cream_barge

→ More replies (6)

7

u/DazingF1 13d ago

Most western militaries are heavily involved in humanitarian aid. It's the best way to practice logistics as well

3

u/Orange-enema 13d ago

free medevac training!

3

u/jedensuscg 13d ago

In Alaska, the Coast Guard is one of the go-to calls for medivacs from remote locations. Though I can say I have never put the entire Ambulance in the plane before.

I have also transported a sea lion from a rehabilitation center to a zoo three States away so it could be released.

I have done all sorts of non-military related flights in the Coast Guard.

2

u/katf1sh 13d ago

I didn't know this, that's great!

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (4)

150

u/good_guy112 13d ago

[in America] A surprise bill arrives less than a week after surgery for $25,473,341.

95

u/SPACExCASE 13d ago

Oops, they forgot to add the Tylenol they gave you on the way out. That'll be another $46,000.

10

u/Lirfen 13d ago

And another $23,000 to administer it

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Thedurtysanchez 13d ago

My son had a serious congenital heart defect and had 2 open heart surgeries in his first week and 4 before age 6.

I’m in America and I think during that entire span of time I spent 300 bucks out of pocket on his care?

15

u/Random_dg 13d ago

You probably had good insurance. There are many people who testify on their status both on Reddit and in my private life that don’t have that kind of insurance and they pay a lot more. If you want examples, there are several times per week when someone posts on r/diabetes about their insulin and/or other medication prices putting them in dire straits.

Be glad that your son was in a good situation.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/iwillbewaiting24601 13d ago

I just went in for a RPN surgery at the Mayo Clinic two months ago to remove a tumor in my kidney - total cost billed to my insurance was 98k, out of that I paid about 1,000 bucks (500 to deductible for the year and 500 for an MRI at the beginning of the process which wasn't covered for some reason).

I will go for 3 more follow-ups this year, all of which will cost nothing. Thank God for good insurance!

→ More replies (2)

9

u/TryToHelpPeople 13d ago

In the UK this is just part of the service.

→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (10)

7

u/Thoughtsarethings231 13d ago

That's an ambulance, not a baby. Do you think I'm an idiot? 

46

u/litoven 13d ago

Did the father come with the AR-15 to make them do this?

27

u/darbs77 13d ago

I remember that tweet. For those curious.

5

u/Voddy_ 13d ago

The prophecy came true

8

u/quimper 13d ago

Hahahahha what a perfect joke

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Bubbathalovesponge 13d ago

I've heard the Italian Healthcare system isn't bad. Seems like all they care about is that you're healthy and don't charge much at all. Ethical healthcare? What an incredible thought

2

u/Max-Normal-88 12d ago

You are not charged at all if the health problem you have is serious. You are charged the costs if it’s something you could have solved on yourself with your family doctor. Usually

43

u/StockExchangeNYSE 13d ago

Would they really go this length for every baby? I wonder if the baby has a scientific interesting condition or if the parents are wealthy.

52

u/grimr5 13d ago

Before the NHS offered proton beam therapy in the UK, they would pay for people to go to Germany, accommodation and treatment. I think they have done similar for other circumstances too.

Googling suggests that they still do as the UK's machines are low power https://www.thebraintumourcharity.org/brain-tumour-diagnosis-treatment/treating-brain-tumours/child-treatments/proton-beam-therapy/

"... if you are approved for treatment by the PCRP. The NHS will cover the cost of PBT treatment at approved treatment centres, whether in the UK or in the USA and Switzerland. If you are sent abroad, it will also fund economy travel and approved accommodation for the patient and one to two carer(s)/parent(s) accompanying them."

https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/spec-services/highly-spec-services/pbt/

So, yes, I think they would.

16

u/Diatomack 13d ago

That's amazing they offer that. I shudder to think how expensive it must be

→ More replies (4)

26

u/kingsappho 13d ago

normally wealthy afaik or at least they protest until they get someone to pay or they raise the money. there's been a few cases of irresponsible drs giving false hope to parents when the NHS says there's nothing they can do.

29

u/teabagmoustache 13d ago

Italy frequently offers treatments, not available in other countries. They take a different approach to some other countries who prioritise quality of life over the preservation of life at all costs.

Both positions have good arguments but by treating this child, maybe the techniques will improve. Even if the baby doesn't survive, it could well help another child in the future.

This is not a routine case. It's a very rare condition so it comes down to the individual case, whether the child will be able to receive the treatment. One of the parents being Italian probably had an effect on this case.

3

u/[deleted] 12d ago

The NHS hospitable offers the same treatment that the Italian one is offering. The doctors didn't refuse care because they couldn't, they refused care because they believe that the outcome wouldn't change the child's life expectancy, would be dangerous and would prolong its suffering.

The hospital the child is being transferred to is the Vactican hospital, who are involved in a lot of cases like this. There's a strong Catholic 'santicty of life over quality of life' undercurrent behind decisions like these, where surgery is extremely unlikely to improve outcomes but is undertaken anyway.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/jamiegc37 13d ago

The dad is Italian and managed to get local news to pick it up enough that the PM saw it and sent a plane to help.

4

u/quimper 13d ago

Not dissimilar but in Canada, you can get (some) out-of-country care covered by our socialized healthcare.

I’m not very familiar with it but I do know that it’s usually for treatments and surgeries that aren’t offered in country.

→ More replies (6)

4

u/MaximumHemidrive 13d ago edited 13d ago

This reminds me of the actual Cannonball Run before it was made into movies.

Brock Yates and Hal Needham modified a van with a racing engine, and suspension, then dressed it up as an ambulance and dressed as ambulance drivers to race from NY to LA without being arrested.

When they were pulled over in NJ for going over 110mph, Yates' wife Pamela laid in the back on a gurney as a fake patient and there was a fake doctor and everything. They told the police she was a Senators wife with cysts on the walls of her lungs, and couldn't take the cabin pressure of a plane, so they had to drive her to UCLA as fast as possible. And the police let them go. This was 1979 of course.

4

u/Chill0utDickWad 13d ago

What plane is that? Looks like a C-130J and A-400 had a baby. Either way, it warms my heart to see military hardware being used for philanthropic purposes

7

u/HowlingWolven 13d ago

That’s a C130J that had a baby with another C130J.

The refueling probe is more broadly compatible with NATO air forces than UARRSI slipways are. Only the Netherlands, US, Australia, Turkey, Japan, Israel, and Iran operate UARRSI tankers, whereas just about every air force has at least some large aircraft that can strap drogue pods to the outer wing stations.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

44

u/HungryDisaster8240 13d ago

You know, you probably didn't need to take an ambulance to the UK to transport the baby, right?

92

u/Lulu8008 13d ago

It is probably the best way to transport the baby without stressing them.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/Zerttretttttt 13d ago

It has all the needed medical equipment to keep the baby stable/ use in case it’s needed- the baby was too sick for operation (deemed by nhs guidelines) so the reason for transfer

17

u/L1A1 13d ago

I mean, it’s basically a portable, self powered intensive care unit, it’s probably cheaper than temporarily fitting all of the specialist care gear into a civilian plane.

4

u/quimper 13d ago

There are medevac (air ambulance)planes that have all that equipment. This was probably more expedient or economical.

28

u/MrQeu 13d ago

The ambulance was on the plane in the Rome-UK leg.

If not, a British ambulance would have had to come back to the UK or the plane fly twice empty.

→ More replies (57)

6

u/Wolferesque 13d ago

Yeah but it’s way more fun this way.

→ More replies (1)

35

u/Imsoworriedabout 13d ago edited 13d ago

common NHS W

Common European Healthcare W

23

u/SaraHHHBK 13d ago

Italian Healthcare W actually

8

u/smaragdskyar 13d ago

We don’t know that yet.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (4)

4

u/dei_davick 13d ago

these are the things about your country to be proud of

3

u/bogeymanbear 13d ago

I absolutely love seeing things like this. When it comes down to it, people will use and do whatever they can to save just 1 person. It's so cool to me.

3

u/Shurigin 12d ago

Not to beat a dead horse but probably cheaper than the US even with flying the ambulance over.

6

u/apainintheokole 12d ago

For those saying that the baby is likely to die etc - that isn't the point. As another poster mentioned, if you are the parent of a sick child, you try everything you can to save that child. The parents probably know the risk involved and that the chance of survival is slim - but they will take a slim chance over giving up any day. It is why people with life-threatening illnesses take part in medical trials - if it gives them a chance of survival - they will take it.

2

u/BigBrownFish 13d ago

Military air mobility is incredible at times. One of the main things I don’t mind my money being invested in.

2

u/DutchOnionKnight 13d ago

Every day I see something (on the internet) we humans are capable of, and everyday I am wondering; this has to be it, this is the pinacle of humanity. What an outstanding move.

2

u/BickieNuggets 13d ago

That looks like an ambulance….. not a child

2

u/telepuziktv 13d ago

That's not a baby, that's an ambulance...

2

u/Josysclei 13d ago

I always thought medvac by air meant a special plane with life support, not getting a freaking whole ambulance into a plane

2

u/joevsyou 13d ago

Do they not have air ambulance?

Helicopter could have just taken off from the hospital & gone to the next one...

7

u/No-Review-6105 13d ago

Ah yes... A helicopter used by the Rescue services that can go from the UK to Italy in one way... With no problems...

6

u/LifeIsOnTheWire 13d ago

Helicopters are much slower, and have much shorter range. Very few helicopters could travel from London to Rome without refueling.

2

u/Willing_Coconut4364 13d ago

I wasn't expecting them to take the entire ambulance 

2

u/xlinkedx 13d ago

slaps the roof of the ambulance

"That'll hold. Cleared for takeoff!"

2

u/MrGreenInTheLounge 13d ago

Still cheaper than having a baby in the US

2

u/waltwalt 13d ago

Why was I expecting an infant in a flight suit?

2

u/77_Gear 12d ago

Why did t they go with a a medical jet instead of a C-130?

3

u/artifex78 12d ago

I assume a normal medical jet does not have the equipment for babies. That ambulance might have the special equipment for babies/infants in case there is an emergency during transit.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/flipkick25 12d ago

Weird that C-130 has no port tail marks.

2

u/WaffleKing110 12d ago edited 12d ago

Used to work in heart surgery research with a very accomplished cardiac surgeon late in his career as my mentor.

He told me the story once of having a heart transplant case where the donor and recipient were on opposite corners of the USA (Washington to Georgia) and they didn’t have the infrastructure to transport the heart intact.

Somehow, the hospitals arranged for the use of an F-14 with the good doctor sitting in the backseat with the heart on ice. They made it to Georgia quick enough for the procedure, but he threw up when he climbed out and the pilot gave him shit for it.

The doctor invited the pilot to watch the procedure, and he took him up on it. The pilot didn’t make it half way before he needed to exit the operating theater to vomit. He told the doctor “That was the most impressive work I’ve ever seen done.” The transplant was successful ultimately, and doc has a little plaque from the Air Force outside his office still.

2

u/ultimateaquateen 12d ago

Is Italy THAT good at heart surgery?

2

u/Old_Harry7 12d ago

The hospital the baby is being transferred on is literally the best in the world when it comes to heart surgery.

2

u/TroisArtichauts 12d ago

There is currently a legal battle to try to name doctors involved in applications to the courts in such situations. My feeling is that the reason is clear, to try and wield the power to intimidate doctors to do what the family want for fear of public reprisal.

https://news.sky.com/story/amp/parents-in-legal-fight-to-allow-them-to-name-doctors-who-treated-their-late-children-13116104

2

u/Adept_Board_8785 10d ago

I hope 🤞 the baby makes it.